
RadeonT 780M vs GeForce RTX 3060

RadeonT 780M
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The RadeonT 780M is positioned at rank #142 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RadeonT 780M
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3060
Why is GeForce RTX 3060 better than RadeonT 780M?
Comparing the powerful GeForce RTX 3060 Ti to high-end integrated Radeon 780M graphics illustrates the absolute widest gap in current digital technology. The RTX 3060 Ti delivers roughly 300-400% more raw compute muscle, moving from a world-class integrated chip to a desktop icon that masters 1440p Ultra with high refresh rates and cinematic graphics.
Technically, the Radeon 780M is a formidable integrated solution for high-performance notebooks, but the dedicated RTX 3060 Ti wins on absolute architectural muscle, featuring 8GB of fast VRAM and specialized hardware for Ray Tracing and mature DLSS support. Moving from an ultra-thin laptop with integrated graphics to a 30-series discrete tower is a transformative upgrade, providing the speed and visual stability needed for high-end rendering work in 2026.
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the undisputed winner in absolute rendering performance and interactive speed. it represents the absolute height of graphics power for its segment and provides a world-class experience. The Radeon 780M is the winner for mobile users on high-end laptops who priority uncompromised efficiency and modern media support in a portable package. however, for any stationary build, the discrete 3060 Ti is the superior and definitive choice.
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 139.4% higher G3D Mark score and 200% more VRAM (12 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RadeonT 780M.
| Insight | RadeonT 780M | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-139.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+139.4%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) (4nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 3060 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RadeonT 780M and GeForce RTX 3060

RadeonT 780M
The RadeonT 780M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,098 points.

GeForce RTX 3060
The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RadeonT 780M scores 7,098 versus the GeForce RTX 3060's 16,995 — the GeForce RTX 3060 leads by 139.4%. The RadeonT 780M is built on RDNA 3.0 while the GeForce RTX 3060 uses Ampere, both on 4 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 768 (RadeonT 780M) vs 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060). Raw compute: 8.909 TFLOPS (RadeonT 780M) vs 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060). Boost clocks: 2900 MHz vs 1777 MHz. Ray tracing: 12 RT cores (RadeonT 780M) vs 28 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 112.
| Feature | RadeonT 780M | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,098 | 16,995+139% |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 3584+367% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.909 TFLOPS | 12.74 TFLOPS+43% |
| Boost Clock | 2900 MHz+63% | 1777 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 48 | 112+133% |
| L1 Cache | 0.25 MB | 3.5 MB+1300% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 12 | 28+133% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RadeonT 780M | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RadeonT 780M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3060 has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (RadeonT 780M) vs 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060) — the GeForce RTX 3060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RadeonT 780M | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 12 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RadeonT 780M) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RadeonT 780M | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (RadeonT 780M) vs NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 3060). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RadeonT 780M) vs AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3060).
| Feature | RadeonT 780M | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | NVENC 7th Gen |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The RadeonT 780M draws 15W versus the GeForce RTX 3060's 170W — a 167.6% difference. The RadeonT 780M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RadeonT 780M) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 3060). Power connectors: None vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 242mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | RadeonT 780M | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-91% | 170W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-36% | 550W |
| Power Connector | None | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 242mm |
| Height | 0mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 473.2+373% | 100.0 |
Value Analysis
The RadeonT 780M is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2021).
| Feature | RadeonT 780M | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $329 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $289 |
| Codename | Phoenix | GA106 |
| Release | January 31 2024 | January 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #359 | #114 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















