RadeonT 780M vs Tesla M60

AMD

RadeonT 780M

2024Core: 800 MHzBoost: 2900 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Tesla M60

2015Core: 557 MHzBoost: 1178 MHz

RadeonT 780M vs Tesla M60 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

RadeonT 780M vs Tesla M60: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

RadeonT 780M

2024

Why buy it

  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 15W instead of 300W, a 285W reduction.
  • More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).

Tesla M60

2015

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 1900% higher power demand at 300W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
RadeonT 780M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.4% in PassMark G3D (7,098 vs 7,002), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
RadeonT 780M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 4nm process instead of 28nm, 12 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2015. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Tesla M60 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Tesla M60 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, RadeonT 780M has the stronger long-term case.

RadeonT 780M vs Tesla M60 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

RadeonT 780M

The RadeonT 780M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,098 points.

NVIDIA

Tesla M60

The Tesla M60 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,002 points.

Graphics Performance

The RadeonT 780M scores 7,098 and the Tesla M60 reaches 7,002 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RadeonT 780M is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Tesla M60 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 4 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 768 (RadeonT 780M) vs 2,048 (Tesla M60). Raw compute: 8.909 TFLOPS (RadeonT 780M) vs 4.825 TFLOPS ×2 (Tesla M60). Boost clocks: 2900 MHz vs 1178 MHz.

FeatureRadeonT 780MTesla M60
G3D Mark Score
7,098+1%
7,002
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
Maxwell 2.0
Process Node
4 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
768
2048 ×2+167%
Compute (TFLOPS)
8.909 TFLOPS+85%
4.825 TFLOPS ×2
Boost Clock
2900 MHz+146%
1178 MHz
ROPs
32
64 ×2+100%
TMUs
48
128 ×2+167%
L1 Cache
256 KB
768 KB+200%
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeonT 780MTesla M60
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the RadeonT 780M and 256-bit on the Tesla M60.

FeatureRadeonT 780MTesla M60
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit
256-bit+100%
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (RadeonT 780M) vs 12.1 (Tesla M60). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

FeatureRadeonT 780MTesla M60
DirectX
12.2
12.1
Vulkan
1.3+18%
1.1
OpenGL
4.6+2%
4.5
Max Displays
4
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (RadeonT 780M) vs NVENC 2.0 (2x) (Tesla M60). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs PureVideo HD VP6 (2x). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RadeonT 780M) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (Tesla M60).

FeatureRadeonT 780MTesla M60
Encoder
VCN 4.0
NVENC 2.0 (2x)
Decoder
VCN 4.0
PureVideo HD VP6 (2x)
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
MPEG-2,H.264
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RadeonT 780M draws 15W versus the Tesla M60's 300W — a 181% difference. The RadeonT 780M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RadeonT 780M) vs 350W (Tesla M60). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.

FeatureRadeonT 780MTesla M60
TDP
15W-95%
300W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
267mm
Height
0mm
111mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Perf/Watt
473.2+1931%
23.3
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is RadeonT 780M (2024 vs 2015).

FeatureRadeonT 780MTesla M60
MSRP
$3000
Codename
Phoenix
GM204
Release
January 31 2024
August 30 2015
Ranking
#359
#355

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.