
RadeonT 780M

Tesla M60
RadeonT 780M vs Tesla M60 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
RadeonT 780M vs Tesla M60 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
RadeonT 780M vs Tesla M60: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
RadeonT 780M
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 300W, a 285W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
Tesla M60
2015Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌1900% higher power demand at 300W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
RadeonT 780M vs Tesla M60 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

RadeonT 780M
The RadeonT 780M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,098 points.

Tesla M60
The Tesla M60 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,002 points.
Graphics Performance
The RadeonT 780M scores 7,098 and the Tesla M60 reaches 7,002 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RadeonT 780M is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Tesla M60 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 4 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 768 (RadeonT 780M) vs 2,048 (Tesla M60). Raw compute: 8.909 TFLOPS (RadeonT 780M) vs 4.825 TFLOPS ×2 (Tesla M60). Boost clocks: 2900 MHz vs 1178 MHz.
| Feature | RadeonT 780M | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,098+1% | 7,002 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 2048 ×2+167% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.909 TFLOPS+85% | 4.825 TFLOPS ×2 |
| Boost Clock | 2900 MHz+146% | 1178 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64 ×2+100% |
| TMUs | 48 | 128 ×2+167% |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 768 KB+200% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RadeonT 780M | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the RadeonT 780M and 256-bit on the Tesla M60.
| Feature | RadeonT 780M | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RadeonT 780M) vs 12.1 (Tesla M60). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | RadeonT 780M | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (RadeonT 780M) vs NVENC 2.0 (2x) (Tesla M60). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs PureVideo HD VP6 (2x). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RadeonT 780M) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (Tesla M60).
| Feature | RadeonT 780M | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | NVENC 2.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | PureVideo HD VP6 (2x) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The RadeonT 780M draws 15W versus the Tesla M60's 300W — a 181% difference. The RadeonT 780M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RadeonT 780M) vs 350W (Tesla M60). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | RadeonT 780M | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-95% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 473.2+1931% | 23.3 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is RadeonT 780M (2024 vs 2015).
| Feature | RadeonT 780M | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $3000 |
| Codename | Phoenix | GM204 |
| Release | January 31 2024 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #359 | #355 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














