RadeonT 780M vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
RadeonT 780M
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The RadeonT 780M is positioned at rank #142 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RadeonT 780M
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 344.9% higher G3D Mark score and 200% more VRAM (12 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RadeonT 780M.
| Insight | RadeonT 780M | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-344.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+344.9%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) (4nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 4nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (285mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RadeonT 780M and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
RadeonT 780M
The RadeonT 780M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,098 points.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RadeonT 780M scores 7,098 versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 31,578 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 344.9%. The RadeonT 780M is built on RDNA 3.0 while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 4 nm process. Shader units: 768 (RadeonT 780M) vs 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Raw compute: 8.909 TFLOPS (RadeonT 780M) vs 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Boost clocks: 2900 MHz vs 2610 MHz. Ray tracing: 12 RT cores (RadeonT 780M) vs 60 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 240.
| Feature | RadeonT 780M | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,098 | 31,578+345% |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 7680+900% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.909 TFLOPS | 40.09 TFLOPS+350% |
| Boost Clock | 2900 MHz+11% | 2610 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 80+150% |
| TMUs | 48 | 240+400% |
| L1 Cache | 0.25 MB | 7.5 MB+2900% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 48 MB+2300% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 12 | 60+400% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RadeonT 780M lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | RadeonT 780M | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RadeonT 780M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (RadeonT 780M) vs 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RadeonT 780M | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 12 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 48 MB+2300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RadeonT 780M) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RadeonT 780M | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (RadeonT 780M) vs NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RadeonT 780M) vs AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti).
| Feature | RadeonT 780M | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | NVENC (8th Gen) |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | NVDEC (5th Gen) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The RadeonT 780M draws 15W versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 285W — a 180% difference. The RadeonT 780M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RadeonT 780M) vs 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Power connectors: None vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 285mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | RadeonT 780M | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-95% | 285W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-50% | 700W |
| Power Connector | None | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 285mm |
| Height | 0mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 473.2+327% | 110.8 |
Value Analysis
The RadeonT 780M is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2023).
| Feature | RadeonT 780M | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $799 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $590 |
| Codename | Phoenix | AD104 |
| Release | January 31 2024 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #359 | #11 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RadeonT 780M and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
