RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile vs GeForce GTX 1060
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is significantly newer (2023 vs 2016). The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 1060 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 48.1% higher G3D Mark score and 33.3% more VRAM (8 GB vs 6 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1060.
| Insight | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+48.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-48.1%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace / 5nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile and GeForce GTX 1060
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1635 MHz to 2115 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,909 points.
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile scores 14,909 versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 10,064 — the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile leads by 48.1%. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce GTX 1060 uses Pascal, both on 5 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060). Raw compute: 12.99 TFLOPS (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060). Boost clocks: 2115 MHz vs 1733 MHz.
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,909+48% | 10,064 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Pascal |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+20% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.99 TFLOPS+46% | 8.873 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2115 MHz+22% | 1733 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 96 | 160+67% |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB+219% | 0.94 MB |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB+500% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GeForce GTX 1060 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 256 GB/s (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) — a 33.3% advantage for the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 12 MB (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) — the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+33% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 256 GB/s+33% | 192 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB+500% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1060). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ada) (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060). Decoder: NVDEC (Ada) vs NVDEC (Pascal). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060).
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Ada) | NVENC (Pascal) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Ada) | NVDEC (Pascal) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile draws 50W versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 180W — a 113% difference. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 1060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 173mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-72% | 180W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 400W-20% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 173mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 298.2+433% | 55.9 |
Value Analysis
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2016).
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $249 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $60 |
| Codename | AD107 | GP104 |
| Release | March 21 2023 | May 27 2016 |
| Ranking | #155 | #137 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile and GeForce GTX 1060
