RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile vs Quadro RTX 4000
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
Popular choices:
Quadro RTX 4000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
Performance Per Dollar Quadro RTX 4000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro RTX 4000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile.
| Insight | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile | Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.1%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace / 5nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Turing (2018−2022)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro RTX 4000 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile and Quadro RTX 4000
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1635 MHz to 2115 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,909 points.
Quadro RTX 4000
The Quadro RTX 4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1005 MHz to 1545 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,925 points. Launch price was $899.
Graphics Performance
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile scores 14,909 and the Quadro RTX 4000 reaches 14,925 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro RTX 4000 uses Turing, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 2,304 (Quadro RTX 4000). Raw compute: 12.99 TFLOPS (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 7.119 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 4000). Boost clocks: 2115 MHz vs 1545 MHz. Ray tracing: 24 RT cores (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 36 (Quadro RTX 4000) with 96 Tensor cores vs 288.
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile | Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,909 | 14,925 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Turing |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+33% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.99 TFLOPS+82% | 7.119 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2115 MHz+37% | 1545 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 96 | 144+50% |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB+30% | 2.3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB+200% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 24 | 36+50% |
| Tensor Cores | 96 | 288+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Quadro RTX 4000 is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile | Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 256 GB/s (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 448 GB/s (Quadro RTX 4000) — a 75% advantage for the Quadro RTX 4000. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 12 MB (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 4 MB (Quadro RTX 4000) — the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile | Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 256 GB/s | 448 GB/s+75% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB+200% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 12.2 (Quadro RTX 4000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile | Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ada) (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs NVENC 7.0 (Quadro RTX 4000). Decoder: NVDEC (Ada) vs PureVideo HD VP10. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 4000).
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile | Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Ada) | NVENC 7.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Ada) | PureVideo HD VP10 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile draws 50W versus the Quadro RTX 4000's 160W — a 104.8% difference. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 500W (Quadro RTX 4000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 241mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 80°C.
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile | Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-69% | 160W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 241mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 298.2+220% | 93.3 |
Value Analysis
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2018).
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile | Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $899 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $220 |
| Codename | AD107 | TU104 |
| Release | March 21 2023 | November 13 2018 |
| Ranking | #155 | #154 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile and Quadro RTX 4000
