RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
VS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

NVIDIA

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

2023Core: 1635 MHzBoost: 2115 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

2024Core: 1620 MHzBoost: 2130 MHz

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

#8
100%
#16
Radeon RX 7600S
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
155%
#19
Radeon RX 5600
MSRP: $229|Avg: $150
137%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

#7
100%
#16
Radeon RX 7600S
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
155%
#19
Radeon RX 5600
MSRP: $229|Avg: $150
137%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile.

InsightRTX 2000 Ada Generation MobileRTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-0.1%)
Leading raw performance (+0.1%)
Longevity
🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace / 5nm)
🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace / 5nm)
Ecosystem
✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling
✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling
VRAM
🎮 High Capacity (8 GB)
🎮 High Capacity (8 GB)
Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile and RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

NVIDIA

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1635 MHz to 2115 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,909 points.

NVIDIA

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 12 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1620 MHz to 2130 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 22 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,923 points. Launch price was $649.

Graphics Performance

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile scores 14,909 and the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU reaches 14,923 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 3,072 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 2,816 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Raw compute: 12.99 TFLOPS (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 12 TFLOPS (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Boost clocks: 2115 MHz vs 2130 MHz. Ray tracing: 24 RT cores (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 22 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) with 96 Tensor cores vs 88.

FeatureRTX 2000 Ada Generation MobileRTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
G3D Mark Score
14,909
14,923
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Ada Lovelace
Process Node
5 nm
5 nm
Shading Units
3072+9%
2816
Compute (TFLOPS)
12.99 TFLOPS+8%
12 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2115 MHz
2130 MHz
ROPs
48
48
TMUs
96+9%
88
L1 Cache
3 MB+7%
2.8 MB
L2 Cache
12 MB
12 MB
Ray Tracing Cores
24+9%
22
Tensor Cores
96+9%
88

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRTX 2000 Ada Generation MobileRTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 2.0
DLSS 2.0
Frame Generation
FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible)
FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureRTX 2000 Ada Generation MobileRTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
VRAM Capacity
8 GB
8 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
256 GB/s
256 GB/s
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
12 MB
12 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 12.2 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureRTX 2000 Ada Generation MobileRTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12.2+2%
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ada) (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Decoder: NVDEC (Ada) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU).

FeatureRTX 2000 Ada Generation MobileRTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Encoder
NVENC (Ada)
8th Gen NVENC
Decoder
NVDEC (Ada)
5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs
H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile draws 50W versus the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU's 50W — a 0% difference. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 500W (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 80°C.

FeatureRTX 2000 Ada Generation MobileRTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
TDP
50W
50W
Recommended PSU
500W
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
0mm
Height
0mm
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
85
80°C-6%
Perf/Watt
298.2
298.5