RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile vs Radeon RX 6650M
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
Popular choices:
Radeon RX 6650M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6650M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 6650M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile.
| Insight | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile | Radeon RX 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.8%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace / 5nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 2.0 / 7nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon RX 6650M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile and Radeon RX 6650M
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1635 MHz to 2115 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,909 points.
Radeon RX 6650M
The Radeon RX 6650M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2068 MHz to 2416 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,171 points.
Graphics Performance
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile scores 14,909 and the Radeon RX 6650M reaches 15,171 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 6650M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 1,792 (Radeon RX 6650M). Raw compute: 12.99 TFLOPS (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 8.659 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6650M). Boost clocks: 2115 MHz vs 2416 MHz. Ray tracing: 24 RT cores (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 28 (Radeon RX 6650M) with 96 Tensor cores.
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile | Radeon RX 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,909 | 15,171+2% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+71% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.99 TFLOPS+50% | 8.659 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2115 MHz | 2416 MHz+14% |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 96 | 112+17% |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB+500% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB+500% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 24 | 28+17% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6650M is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 6650M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile | Radeon RX 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | FSR 3 (Native) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 256 GB/s (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon RX 6650M) — a 14.3% advantage for the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 12 MB (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 6650M) — the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile | Radeon RX 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 256 GB/s+14% | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB+500% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 6650M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile | Radeon RX 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ada) (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6650M). Decoder: NVDEC (Ada) vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 6650M).
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile | Radeon RX 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Ada) | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Ada) | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile draws 50W versus the Radeon RX 6650M's 120W — a 82.4% difference. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 650W (Radeon RX 6650M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 80°C.
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile | Radeon RX 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-58% | 120W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-23% | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 298.2+136% | 126.4 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile and Radeon RX 6650M
