RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile vs GeForce RTX 2060
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5.6% higher G3D Mark score and 33.3% more VRAM (8 GB vs 6 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce RTX 2060.
| Insight | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+5.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-5.6%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace / 5nm) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (6 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile and GeForce RTX 2060
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1635 MHz to 2115 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,909 points.
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile scores 14,909 versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 14,114 — the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile leads by 5.6%. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce RTX 2060 uses Turing, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060). Raw compute: 12.99 TFLOPS (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060). Boost clocks: 2115 MHz vs 1680 MHz. Ray tracing: 24 RT cores (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 30 (GeForce RTX 2060) with 96 Tensor cores vs 240.
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,909+6% | 14,114 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Turing |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+60% | 1920 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.99 TFLOPS+101% | 6.451 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2115 MHz+26% | 1680 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 48 |
| TMUs | 96 | 120+25% |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB+58% | 1.9 MB |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB+300% | 3 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 24 | 30+25% |
| Tensor Cores | 96 | 240+150% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 2060 has 6 GB. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 256 GB/s (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 336 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2060) — a 31.3% advantage for the GeForce RTX 2060. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 12 MB (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) — the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+33% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 256 GB/s | 336 GB/s+31% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB+300% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ada) (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060). Decoder: NVDEC (Ada) vs NVDEC (Turing). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060).
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Ada) | NVENC (Turing) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Ada) | NVDEC (Turing) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile draws 50W versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 160W — a 104.8% difference. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 2060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 229mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 72.
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-69% | 160W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 229mm |
| Height | 0mm | 113mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | 72-15% |
| Perf/Watt | 298.2+238% | 88.2 |
Value Analysis
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $349 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $120 |
| Codename | AD107 | TU106 |
| Release | March 21 2023 | January 7 2019 |
| Ranking | #155 | #168 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile and GeForce RTX 2060
