RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile vs GeForce RTX 4060
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4060
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 31.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile.
| Insight | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-31.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+31.1%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 4060 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile and GeForce RTX 4060
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1635 MHz to 2115 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,909 points.
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile scores 14,909 versus the GeForce RTX 4060's 19,548 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 31.1%. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce RTX 4060 uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 3,072 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060). Raw compute: 12.99 TFLOPS (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060). Boost clocks: 2115 MHz vs 2460 MHz. Ray tracing: 24 RT cores (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 24 (GeForce RTX 4060) with 96 Tensor cores vs 96.
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,909 | 19,548+31% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072 | 3072 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.99 TFLOPS | 15.11 TFLOPS+16% |
| Boost Clock | 2115 MHz | 2460 MHz+16% |
| ROPs | 48 | 48 |
| TMUs | 96 | 96 |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB | 3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB | 24 MB+100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 24 | 24 |
| Tensor Cores | 96 | 96 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 256 GB/s (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 272 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060) — a 6.3% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 12 MB (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 256 GB/s | 272 GB/s+6% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB | 24 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ada) (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060). Decoder: NVDEC (Ada) vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060).
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Ada) | NVENC 8th gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Ada) | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile draws 50W versus the GeForce RTX 4060's 115W — a 78.8% difference. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 240mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 73°C.
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-57% | 115W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-9% | 550W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 240mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | 73°C-14% |
| Perf/Watt | 298.2+75% | 170.0 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile and GeForce RTX 4060
