GeForce RTX 3070 vs A10G
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:
A10G
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3070
Performance Per Dollar A10G
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 63.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the A10G offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3070 | A10G |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+63.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-63.1%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (24 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3070 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $200 versus $2,000 for the A10G, it costs 90% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 1530.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3070 | A10G |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1530.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($200) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($2,000) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and A10G
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.
A10G
The A10G is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1710 MHz. It has 9216 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,598 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the A10G's 13,598 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 63.1%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the A10G uses Ampere, both on a 8 nm process. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 9,216 (A10G). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 31.52 TFLOPS (A10G). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 1710 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 72 (A10G) with 184 Tensor cores vs 288.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | A10G |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172+63% | 13,598 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888 | 9216+57% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS | 31.52 TFLOPS+55% |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | 1710 MHz |
| ROPs | 96 | 96 |
| TMUs | 184 | 288+57% |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB | 9 MB+55% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 6 MB+50% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46 | 72+57% |
| Tensor Cores | 184 | 288+57% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The A10G relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | A10G |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3070 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the A10G has 24 GB. The A10G offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 6 MB (A10G) — the A10G has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | A10G |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 24 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 6 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12 Ultimate (A10G). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | A10G |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs NVENC 7th Gen (A10G). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (A10G).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | A10G |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | NVENC 7th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the A10G's 150W — a 37.8% difference. The A10G is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 500W (A10G). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs Unknown.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | A10G |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 150W-32% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 500W-23% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | Unknown-100% |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8+11% | 90.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 MSRP and currently averages $200, while the A10G launched at $2500 and now averages $2000. The GeForce RTX 3070 costs 90% less ($1800 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 110.9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 6.8 (A10G) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 1530.9% better value. The A10G is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | A10G |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499-80% | $2500 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $200-90% | $2000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 110.9+1531% | 6.8 |
| Codename | GA104 | GA102 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #63 | #182 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 3070 and A10G
