GeForce RTX 4070 vs A10G
GeForce RTX 4070
Popular choices:
A10G
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070
Performance Per Dollar A10G
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 98% higher G3D Mark score. However, the A10G offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4070 | A10G |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+98%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-98%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (24 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (304mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4070 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $550 versus $2,000 for the A10G, it costs 73% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 619.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4070 | A10G |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+619.9%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($550) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($2,000) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 and A10G
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.
A10G
The A10G is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1710 MHz. It has 9216 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,598 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the A10G's 13,598 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 98%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the A10G uses Ampere, both on 5 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 9,216 (A10G). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 31.52 TFLOPS (A10G). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 1710 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 72 (A10G) with 184 Tensor cores vs 288.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | A10G |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,919+98% | 13,598 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888 | 9216+57% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 29.15 TFLOPS | 31.52 TFLOPS+8% |
| Boost Clock | 2475 MHz+45% | 1710 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 184 | 288+57% |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB | 9 MB+55% |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+500% | 6 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46 | 72+57% |
| Tensor Cores | 184 | 288+57% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The A10G lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The A10G relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | A10G |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the A10G has 24 GB. The A10G offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 6 MB (A10G) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | A10G |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 24 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+500% | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12 Ultimate (A10G). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | A10G |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs NVENC 7th Gen (A10G). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (A10G).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | A10G |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | NVENC 7th Gen |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the A10G's 150W — a 28.6% difference. The A10G is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 500W (A10G). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 304mm vs 267mm, occupying 3 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs Unknown.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | A10G |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 150W-25% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 500W-23% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 304mm | 267mm |
| Height | 137mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 3 | 1-67% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | Unknown-100% |
| Perf/Watt | 134.6+48% | 90.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599 MSRP and currently averages $550, while the A10G launched at $2500 and now averages $2000. The GeForce RTX 4070 costs 72.5% less ($1450 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 48.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 6.8 (A10G) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 619.1% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | A10G |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599-76% | $2500 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $550-73% | $2000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 48.9+619% | 6.8 |
| Codename | AD104 | GA102 |
| Release | April 12 2023 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #32 | #182 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4070 and A10G
