GeForce RTX 4070 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
GeForce RTX 4070
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 111.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (12 GB vs 6 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4070 | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+111.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-111.2%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (6 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (304mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $85 versus $550 for the GeForce RTX 4070, it costs 85% less. While it maintains significantly lower raw performance, this results in a 206.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4070 | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+206.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($550) | ✅More affordable ($85) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 and GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,747 points. Launch price was $279.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti's 12,747 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 111.2%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti uses Turing, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 1,536 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 5.437 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 1770 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,919+111% | 12,747 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Turing |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+283% | 1536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 29.15 TFLOPS+436% | 5.437 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2475 MHz+40% | 1770 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 184+92% | 96 |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+287% | 1.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+2300% | 1.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti has 6 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 288 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) — a 75% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070. Bus width: 192-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+100% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504 GB/s+75% | 288 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+2300% | 1.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs NVENC 7th gen (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | NVENC 7th gen |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC 4th gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti's 120W — a 50% difference. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 450W (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 304mm vs 229mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 120W-40% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 450W-31% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 304mm | 229mm |
| Height | 137mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 3 | 2-33% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 134.6+27% | 106.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599 MSRP and currently averages $550, while the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti launched at $279 and now averages $85. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti costs 84.5% less ($465 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 48.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 150.0 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti offers 206.7% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $279-53% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $550 | $85-85% |
| Performance per Dollar | 48.9 | 150.0+207% |
| Codename | AD104 | TU116 |
| Release | April 12 2023 | February 22 2019 |
| Ranking | #32 | #204 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4070 and GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
