GeForce RTX 4070 vs GRID K260Q
GeForce RTX 4070
Popular choices:
GRID K260Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070
Performance Per Dollar GRID K260Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 4070 is significantly newer (2023 vs 2013). The GeForce RTX 4070 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GRID K260Q lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 812.8% higher G3D Mark score and 500% more VRAM (12 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID K260Q.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4070 | GRID K260Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+812.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-812.8%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (304mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GRID K260Q offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $15 versus $550 for the GeForce RTX 4070, it costs 97% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 301.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4070 | GRID K260Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+301.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($550) | ✅More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 and GRID K260Q
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.
GRID K260Q
The GRID K260Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,949 points. Launch price was $937.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the GRID K260Q's 2,949 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 812.8%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the GRID K260Q uses Kepler, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 1,536 (GRID K260Q). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K260Q).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | GRID K260Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,919+813% | 2,949 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Kepler |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+283% | 1536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 29.15 TFLOPS+1173% | 2.289 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 184+44% | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+4362% | 0.13 MB |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+7100% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GRID K260Q lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GRID K260Q relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | GRID K260Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the GRID K260Q has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 0.5 MB (GRID K260Q) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | GRID K260Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+500% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+200% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+7100% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the GRID K260Q's 225W — a 11.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 350W (GRID K260Q). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | GRID K260Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W-11% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 350W-46% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 304mm | — |
| Height | 137mm | — |
| Slots | 3 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 134.6+927% | 13.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599 MSRP and currently averages $550, while the GRID K260Q launched at $937 and now averages $15. The GRID K260Q costs 97.3% less ($535 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 48.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 196.6 (GRID K260Q) — the GRID K260Q offers 302% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | GRID K260Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599-36% | $937 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $550 | $15-97% |
| Performance per Dollar | 48.9 | 196.6+302% |
| Codename | AD104 | GK104 |
| Release | April 12 2023 | June 28 2013 |
| Ranking | #32 | #589 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4070 and GRID K260Q
