
GeForce RTX 4070 vs Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU

GeForce RTX 4070
Popular choices:

Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070
Performance Per Dollar Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2411.1% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (12 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4070 | Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2411.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2411.1%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Legacy) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (304mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4070 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $550 (vs $100), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 356.6% better value per dollar than the Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4070 | Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+356.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($550) | ✅More affordable ($100) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 and Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU

GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.
Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU
The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in December 6 2018. The thermal design power (TDP) is 7W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,072 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU's 1,072 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 2411.1%.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,919+2411% | 1,072 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU has 0 MB. The GeForce RTX 4070 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs System.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504 GB/s | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU's 7W — a 186.5% difference. The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 1W (Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Integrated.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 7W-97% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Integrated |
| Length | 304mm | — |
| Height | 137mm | — |
| Slots | 3 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 134.6 | 153.1+14% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599 MSRP and currently averages $550, while the Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU launched at $200 and now averages $100. The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU costs 81.8% less ($450 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 48.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 10.7 (Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 357% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $200-67% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $550 | $100-82% |
| Performance per Dollar | 48.9+357% | 10.7 |
| Codename | AD104 | — |
| Release | April 12 2023 | December 6 2018 |
| Ranking | #32 | #860 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











