GeForce RTX 4070 vs Radeon RX 6500
GeForce RTX 4070
Popular choices:
Radeon RX 6500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6500
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 4070 is significantly newer (2023 vs 0). The GeForce RTX 4070 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon RX 6500 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 253.7% higher G3D Mark score and 200% more VRAM (12 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 6500.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+253.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-253.7%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | Legacy (Standard Node) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (304mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 6500 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $150 versus $550 for the GeForce RTX 4070, it costs 73% less. While it maintains significantly lower raw performance, this results in a 3.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+3.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($550) | ✅More affordable ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 and Radeon RX 6500
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.
Radeon RX 6500
The Radeon RX 6500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in sem dados. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,610 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the Radeon RX 6500's 7,610 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 253.7%.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,919+254% | 7,610 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both GPUs support Frame Generation technologies, but they achieve it differently. The GeForce RTX 4070 uses DLSS 3 (AI-based) which is hardware-accelerated on Tensor Cores, often providing superior image quality. The Radeon RX 6500 utilizes FSR 3 & AFMF, which is more open but driver-based. Both can significantly boost FPS in supported titles.The GeForce RTX 4070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 6500 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | FSR 3 (Native) |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6500 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 144 GB/s (Radeon RX 6500) — a 250% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070. Bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+200% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504 GB/s+250% | 144 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+200% | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 6500). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs None (Radeon RX 6500). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 6500).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | None |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the Radeon RX 6500's 75W — a 90.9% difference. The Radeon RX 6500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 400W (Radeon RX 6500). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 304mm vs 172mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 75W-63% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 400W-38% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 304mm | 172mm |
| Height | 137mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 3 | 2-33% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 134.6+33% | 101.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599 MSRP and currently averages $550, while the Radeon RX 6500 launched at $199 and now averages $150. The Radeon RX 6500 costs 72.7% less ($400 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 48.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 50.7 (Radeon RX 6500) — the Radeon RX 6500 offers 3.7% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $199-67% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $550 | $150-73% |
| Performance per Dollar | 48.9 | 50.7+4% |
| Codename | AD104 | — |
| Release | April 12 2023 | sem dados |
| Ranking | #32 | #335 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4070 and Radeon RX 6500
