RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU vs GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design
RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is significantly newer (2023 vs 2017). The RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU.
| Insight | RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.7%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU and GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design
RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
The RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1155 MHz to 2550 MHz. It has 12800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 100 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,153 points.
GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design
The GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 27 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1290 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,566 points.
Graphics Performance
The RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU scores 11,153 and the GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design reaches 11,566 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design uses Pascal, both on 5 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 12,800 (RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design). Raw compute: 65.28 TFLOPS (RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 7.516 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design). Boost clocks: 2550 MHz vs 1468 MHz.
| Feature | RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,153 | 11,566+4% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Pascal |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 12800+400% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 65.28 TFLOPS+769% | 7.516 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2550 MHz+74% | 1468 MHz |
| ROPs | 176+175% | 64 |
| TMUs | 400+150% | 160 |
| L1 Cache | 12.5 MB+1230% | 0.94 MB |
| L2 Cache | 72 MB+3500% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 256 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design) — a 100% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 72 MB (RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design) — the RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 256 GB/s+100% |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 72 MB+3500% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs NVENC 4.0 (GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design).
| Feature | RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | NVENC 4.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU draws 250W versus the GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design's 150W — a 50% difference. The GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 500W (GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 150W-40% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 44.6 | 77.1+73% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU and GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design
