CPU
GPU
RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Popular choices:
Radeon Pro SSG
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro SSG
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is significantly newer (2023 vs 2016). The RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon Pro SSG lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro SSG.
| Insight | RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | Radeon Pro SSG |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU and Radeon Pro SSG
RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
The RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1155 MHz to 2550 MHz. It has 12800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 100 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,153 points.
Radeon Pro SSG
The Radeon Pro SSG is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 26 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,972 points. Launch price was $9,999.
Graphics Performance
The RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU scores 11,153 and the Radeon Pro SSG reaches 10,972 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon Pro SSG uses GCN 3.0, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 12,800 (RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 4,096 (Radeon Pro SSG). Raw compute: 65.28 TFLOPS (RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 8.602 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro SSG). Boost clocks: 2550 MHz vs 1050 MHz.
| Feature | RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | Radeon Pro SSG |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,153+2% | 10,972 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 12800+213% | 4096 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 65.28 TFLOPS+659% | 8.602 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2550 MHz+143% | 1050 MHz |
| ROPs | 176+175% | 64 |
| TMUs | 400+56% | 256 |
| L1 Cache | 12.5 MB+1150% | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 72 MB+1700% | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | Radeon Pro SSG |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 72 MB (RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro SSG) — the RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | Radeon Pro SSG |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 72 MB+1700% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro SSG). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | Radeon Pro SSG |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro SSG). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro SSG).
| Feature | RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | Radeon Pro SSG |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU draws 250W versus the Radeon Pro SSG's 260W — a 3.9% difference. The RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 500W (Radeon Pro SSG). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | Radeon Pro SSG |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W-4% | 260W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 44.6+6% | 42.2 |
Value Analysis
The RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2016).
| Feature | RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | Radeon Pro SSG |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $6999 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $1500 |
| Codename | AD102 | Fiji |
| Release | August 9 2023 | July 26 2016 |
| Ranking | #16 | #249 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU and Radeon Pro SSG
