RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU vs Quadro P4000
RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Popular choices:
Quadro P4000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P4000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is significantly newer (2023 vs 2017). The RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro P4000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro P4000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU.
| Insight | RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | Quadro P4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.5%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro P4000 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU and Quadro P4000
RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
The RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1155 MHz to 2550 MHz. It has 12800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 100 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,153 points.
Quadro P4000
The Quadro P4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 6 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1202 MHz to 1480 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 105W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,431 points. Launch price was $815.
Graphics Performance
The RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU scores 11,153 and the Quadro P4000 reaches 11,431 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro P4000 uses Pascal, both on 5 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 12,800 (RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 1,792 (Quadro P4000). Raw compute: 65.28 TFLOPS (RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 5.304 TFLOPS (Quadro P4000). Boost clocks: 2550 MHz vs 1480 MHz.
| Feature | RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | Quadro P4000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,153 | 11,431+2% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Pascal |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 12800+614% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 65.28 TFLOPS+1131% | 5.304 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2550 MHz+72% | 1480 MHz |
| ROPs | 176+175% | 64 |
| TMUs | 400+257% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 12.5 MB+1794% | 0.66 MB |
| L2 Cache | 72 MB+3500% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | Quadro P4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 72 MB (RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 2 MB (Quadro P4000) — the RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | Quadro P4000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 72 MB+3500% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 12.0 (Quadro P4000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.0. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | Quadro P4000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+30% | 1.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P4000). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs PureVideo HD VP8. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P4000).
| Feature | RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | Quadro P4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | 6th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | PureVideo HD VP8 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU draws 250W versus the Quadro P4000's 105W — a 81.7% difference. The Quadro P4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 500W (Quadro P4000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 241mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | Quadro P4000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 105W-58% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 241mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 44.6 | 108.9+144% |
Value Analysis
The RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2017).
| Feature | RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | Quadro P4000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $815 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $290 |
| Codename | AD102 | GP104 |
| Release | August 9 2023 | February 6 2017 |
| Ranking | #16 | #239 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU and Quadro P4000
