RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU vs GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design
RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU.
| Insight | RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.8%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU and GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design
RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
The RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1155 MHz to 2550 MHz. It has 12800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 100 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,153 points.
GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design
The GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 29 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 885 MHz to 1185 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,461 points.
Graphics Performance
The RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU scores 11,153 and the GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design reaches 11,461 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design uses Turing, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 12,800 (RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 2,304 (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design). Raw compute: 65.28 TFLOPS (RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 5.46 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design). Boost clocks: 2550 MHz vs 1185 MHz. Ray tracing: 100 RT cores (RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 36 (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design) with 400 Tensor cores vs 288.
| Feature | RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,153 | 11,461+3% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Turing |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 12800+456% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 65.28 TFLOPS+1096% | 5.46 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2550 MHz+115% | 1185 MHz |
| ROPs | 176+175% | 64 |
| TMUs | 400+178% | 144 |
| L1 Cache | 12.5 MB+443% | 2.3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 72 MB+1700% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 100+178% | 36 |
| Tensor Cores | 400+39% | 288 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 384 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design) — a 200% advantage for the GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 72 MB (RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design) — the RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 384 GB/s+200% |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 72 MB+1700% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design).
| Feature | RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU draws 250W versus the GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design's 80W — a 103% difference. The GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 80W-68% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 44.6 | 143.3+221% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU and GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design
