RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile vs GeForce GTX 980
RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 980
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is significantly newer (2024 vs 2014). The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 980 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 980.
| Insight | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile | GeForce GTX 980 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile and GeForce GTX 980
RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 26 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 2025 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,162 points.
GeForce GTX 980
The GeForce GTX 980 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 19 2014. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1064 MHz to 1216 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,077 points. Launch price was $549.
Graphics Performance
The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile scores 11,162 and the GeForce GTX 980 reaches 11,077 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce GTX 980 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 2,048 (GeForce GTX 980). Raw compute: 8.294 TFLOPS (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 4.981 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 980). Boost clocks: 2025 MHz vs 1216 MHz.
| Feature | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile | GeForce GTX 980 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,162 | 11,077 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.294 TFLOPS+67% | 4.981 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2025 MHz+67% | 1216 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 64 | 128+100% |
| L1 Cache | 2 MB+167% | 0.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB+500% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile | GeForce GTX 980 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 980 has 4 GB. The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 224 GB/s (GeForce GTX 980) — a 75% advantage for the GeForce GTX 980. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 12 MB (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 980) — the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile | GeForce GTX 980 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 224 GB/s+75% |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB+500% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_2) (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 12.1 (GeForce GTX 980). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile | GeForce GTX 980 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_2) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+27% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile) vs NVENC 3.0 (GeForce GTX 980). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (HEVC),AV1,VP9 (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce GTX 980).
| Feature | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile | GeForce GTX 980 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | NVENC 3.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 (HEVC),AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile draws 35W versus the GeForce GTX 980's 220W — a 145.1% difference. The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 500W (GeForce GTX 980). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile | GeForce GTX 980 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35W-84% | 220W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 267mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 318.9+533% | 50.4 |
Value Analysis
The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2014).
| Feature | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile | GeForce GTX 980 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $549 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $50 |
| Codename | AD107 | GM204 |
| Release | February 26 2024 | September 19 2014 |
| Ranking | #254 | #245 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile and GeForce GTX 980
