RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile vs Quadro M6000 24GB
RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
Popular choices:
Quadro M6000 24GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
Performance Per Dollar Quadro M6000 24GB
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is significantly newer (2024 vs 2016). The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro M6000 24GB lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro M6000 24GB is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.1% higher G3D Mark score and 200% more VRAM (24 GB vs 8 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile.
| Insight | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile | Quadro M6000 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.1%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ✅ More VRAM (+200%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro M6000 24GB remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile and Quadro M6000 24GB
RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 26 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 2025 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,162 points.
Quadro M6000 24GB
The Quadro M6000 24GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 5 2016. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 988 MHz to 1114 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,625 points. Launch price was $4,999.
Graphics Performance
The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile scores 11,162 and the Quadro M6000 24GB reaches 11,625 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro M6000 24GB uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 3,072 (Quadro M6000 24GB). Raw compute: 8.294 TFLOPS (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 6.844 TFLOPS (Quadro M6000 24GB). Boost clocks: 2025 MHz vs 1114 MHz.
| Feature | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile | Quadro M6000 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,162 | 11,625+4% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 3072+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.294 TFLOPS+21% | 6.844 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2025 MHz+82% | 1114 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 96+200% |
| TMUs | 64 | 256+300% |
| L1 Cache | 2 MB+82% | 1.1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB+300% | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile | Quadro M6000 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M6000 24GB has 24 GB. The Quadro M6000 24GB offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 317 GB/s (Quadro M6000 24GB) — a 147.7% advantage for the Quadro M6000 24GB. Bus width: 64-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 12 MB (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 3 MB (Quadro M6000 24GB) — the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile | Quadro M6000 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 24 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 317 GB/s+148% |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 384-bit+500% |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB+300% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_2) (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 12/1 (Quadro M6000 24GB). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile | Quadro M6000 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_2) | 12/1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+27% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile) vs NVENC 4.0 (Quadro M6000 24GB). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (HEVC),AV1,VP9 (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro M6000 24GB).
| Feature | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile | Quadro M6000 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | NVENC 4.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 (HEVC),AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile draws 35W versus the Quadro M6000 24GB's 250W — a 150.9% difference. The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 500W (Quadro M6000 24GB). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile | Quadro M6000 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35W-86% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 267mm |
| Height | — | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 318.9+586% | 46.5 |
Value Analysis
The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2016).
| Feature | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile | Quadro M6000 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $4999 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $600 |
| Codename | AD107 | GM200 |
| Release | February 26 2024 | March 5 2016 |
| Ranking | #254 | #233 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile and Quadro M6000 24GB
