CPU
GPU
RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
Popular choices:
Radeon Pro Vega 48
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro Vega 48
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro Vega 48 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) (14nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | Standard Buffer (0 MB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Pro Vega 48 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile and Radeon Pro Vega 48
RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 26 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 2025 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,162 points.
Radeon Pro Vega 48
The Radeon Pro Vega 48 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 19 2019. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1300 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,270 points.
Graphics Performance
The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile scores 11,162 and the Radeon Pro Vega 48 reaches 11,270 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon Pro Vega 48 uses GCN 5.0, both on 5 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 3,072 (Radeon Pro Vega 48). Raw compute: 8.294 TFLOPS (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 7.987 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 48). Boost clocks: 2025 MHz vs 1300 MHz.
| Feature | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,162 | 11,270 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 3072+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.294 TFLOPS+4% | 7.987 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2025 MHz+56% | 1300 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 64 | 192+200% |
| L1 Cache | 2 MB+167% | 0.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB+200% | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega 48 has 0 MB. The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 12 MB (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 48) — the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB+200% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_2) (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 48). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_2) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 48). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (HEVC),AV1,VP9 (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 48).
| Feature | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 (HEVC),AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile draws 35W versus the Radeon Pro Vega 48's 30W — a 15.4% difference. The Radeon Pro Vega 48 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 48). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35W | 30W-14% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 318.9 | 375.7+18% |
Value Analysis
The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2019).
| Feature | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $450 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $450 |
| Codename | AD107 | Vega 10 |
| Release | February 26 2024 | March 19 2019 |
| Ranking | #254 | #241 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile and Radeon Pro Vega 48
