RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile vs Radeon PRO W6600M
RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
Popular choices:
Radeon PRO W6600M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO W6600M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon PRO W6600M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile.
| Insight | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.2%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) / 7nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon PRO W6600M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile and Radeon PRO W6600M
RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 26 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 2025 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,162 points.
Radeon PRO W6600M
The Radeon PRO W6600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 8 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1224 MHz to 2034 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,407 points.
Graphics Performance
The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile scores 11,162 and the Radeon PRO W6600M reaches 11,407 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon PRO W6600M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 1,792 (Radeon PRO W6600M). Raw compute: 8.294 TFLOPS (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 7.29 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6600M). Boost clocks: 2025 MHz vs 2034 MHz. Ray tracing: 16 RT cores (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 28 (Radeon PRO W6600M) with 64 Tensor cores.
| Feature | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,162 | 11,407+2% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+14% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.294 TFLOPS+14% | 7.29 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2025 MHz | 2034 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 64 | 112+75% |
| L1 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB+500% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 16 | 28+75% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon PRO W6600M) — a 75% advantage for the Radeon PRO W6600M. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 12 MB (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 2 MB (Radeon PRO W6600M) — the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 224 GB/s+75% |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB+500% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_2) (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6600M). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 5.
| Feature | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_2) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+17% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 5+25% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6600M). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (HEVC),AV1,VP9 (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Radeon PRO W6600M).
| Feature | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 (HEVC),AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile draws 35W versus the Radeon PRO W6600M's 90W — a 88% difference. The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W6600M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35W-61% | 90W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 318.9+152% | 126.7 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile and Radeon PRO W6600M
