RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile vs Quadro RTX 3000
RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
Popular choices:
Quadro RTX 3000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
Performance Per Dollar Quadro RTX 3000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is significantly newer (2024 vs 2018). The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro RTX 3000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.8% higher G3D Mark score and 33.3% more VRAM (8 GB vs 6 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro RTX 3000.
| Insight | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile | Quadro RTX 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.8%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Turing (2018−2022)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile and Quadro RTX 3000
RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 26 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 2025 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,162 points.
Quadro RTX 3000
The Quadro RTX 3000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,858 points. Launch price was $9,999.
Graphics Performance
The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile scores 11,162 and the Quadro RTX 3000 reaches 10,858 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro RTX 3000 uses Turing, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 4,608 (Quadro RTX 3000). Raw compute: 8.294 TFLOPS (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 16.31 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 3000). Boost clocks: 2025 MHz vs 1770 MHz. Ray tracing: 16 RT cores (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 72 (Quadro RTX 3000) with 64 Tensor cores vs 576.
| Feature | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile | Quadro RTX 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,162+3% | 10,858 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Turing |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 4608+125% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.294 TFLOPS | 16.31 TFLOPS+97% |
| Boost Clock | 2025 MHz+14% | 1770 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 96+200% |
| TMUs | 64 | 288+350% |
| L1 Cache | 2 MB | 4.5 MB+125% |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB+100% | 6 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 16 | 72+350% |
| Tensor Cores | 64 | 576+800% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile | Quadro RTX 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro RTX 3000 has 6 GB. The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 12 MB (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 6 MB (Quadro RTX 3000) — the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile | Quadro RTX 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+33% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB+100% | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_2) (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 12.1 (Quadro RTX 3000). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.0. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile | Quadro RTX 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_2) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+40% | 1.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 7th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 3000). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (HEVC),AV1,VP9 (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 3000).
| Feature | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile | Quadro RTX 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 (HEVC),AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile draws 35W versus the Quadro RTX 3000's 260W — a 152.5% difference. The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 500W (Quadro RTX 3000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile | Quadro RTX 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35W-87% | 260W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 318.9+663% | 41.8 |
Value Analysis
The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2018).
| Feature | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile | Quadro RTX 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $800 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $891 |
| Codename | AD107 | TU102 |
| Release | February 26 2024 | August 13 2018 |
| Ranking | #254 | #78 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile and Quadro RTX 3000
