RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU vs GeForce RTX 4070
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 4070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 32.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-32.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+32.5%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (304mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 4070 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU and GeForce RTX 4070
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1155 MHz to 2550 MHz. It has 12800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 100 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points.
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU scores 20,312 versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 26,919 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 32.5%. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce RTX 4070 uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 12,800 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070). Raw compute: 65.28 TFLOPS (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) vs 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070). Boost clocks: 2550 MHz vs 2475 MHz. Ray tracing: 100 RT cores (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) vs 46 (GeForce RTX 4070) with 400 Tensor cores vs 184.
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312 | 26,919+33% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 12800+117% | 5888 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 65.28 TFLOPS+124% | 29.15 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2550 MHz+3% | 2475 MHz |
| ROPs | 176+175% | 64 |
| TMUs | 400+117% | 184 |
| L1 Cache | 12.5 MB+116% | 5.8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 72 MB+100% | 36 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 100+117% | 46 |
| Tensor Cores | 400+117% | 184 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 has 12 GB. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 576 GB/s (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) vs 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070) — a 14.3% advantage for the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU. Bus width: 256-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 72 MB (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) vs 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) — the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+33% | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 576 GB/s+14% | 504 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+33% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 72 MB+100% | 36 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070).
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU draws 175W versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 200W — a 13.3% difference. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 4070). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 304mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 175W-13% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 304mm |
| Height | 111mm | 137mm |
| Slots | 2-33% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 116.1 | 134.6+16% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU and GeForce RTX 4070
