RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU vs Radeon PRO W6800
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
Popular choices:
Radeon PRO W6800
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO W6800
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon PRO W6800 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace / 5nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 2.0 / 7nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (32 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU and Radeon PRO W6800
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1155 MHz to 2550 MHz. It has 12800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 100 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points.
Radeon PRO W6800
The Radeon PRO W6800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 8 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2075 MHz to 2320 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,270 points. Launch price was $2,249.
Graphics Performance
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU scores 20,312 and the Radeon PRO W6800 reaches 20,270 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon PRO W6800 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 12,800 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) vs 3,840 (Radeon PRO W6800). Raw compute: 65.28 TFLOPS (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) vs 17.82 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6800). Boost clocks: 2550 MHz vs 2320 MHz. Ray tracing: 100 RT cores (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) vs 60 (Radeon PRO W6800) with 400 Tensor cores.
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312 | 20,270 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 12800+233% | 3840 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 65.28 TFLOPS+266% | 17.82 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2550 MHz+10% | 2320 MHz |
| ROPs | 176+83% | 96 |
| TMUs | 400+67% | 240 |
| L1 Cache | 12.5 MB+1567% | 0.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 72 MB+1700% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 100+67% | 60 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W6800 has 32 GB. The Radeon PRO W6800 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 72 MB (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) vs 4 MB (Radeon PRO W6800) — the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB | 32 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 576 GB/s | 576 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 72 MB+1700% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6800). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6800). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon PRO W6800).
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU draws 175W versus the Radeon PRO W6800's 250W — a 35.3% difference. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) vs 650W (Radeon PRO W6800). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 175W-30% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 116.1+43% | 81.1 |
Value Analysis
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $2249 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $2249 |
| Codename | AD102 | Navi 21 |
| Release | August 9 2023 | June 8 2021 |
| Ranking | #16 | #74 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU and Radeon PRO W6800
