
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile

RTX A6000
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile vs RTX A6000 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile vs RTX A6000 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile vs RTX A6000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
2023Why buy it
- ✅4.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 230W, a 115W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 16 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 4.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $4,649 MSRP).
RTX A6000
2021Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($4,649 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 16 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ❌RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌100% higher power demand at 230W vs 115W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile vs RTX A6000 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1425 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 9728 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 76 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 23,379 points.

RTX A6000
The RTX A6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1170 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 8192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,815 points.
Graphics Performance
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile scores 23,379 and the RTX A6000 reaches 22,815 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX A6000 uses Ampere, both on 5 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 9,728 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 8,192 (RTX A6000). Raw compute: 41.15 TFLOPS (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 27.77 TFLOPS (RTX A6000). Boost clocks: 1575 MHz vs 1695 MHz. Ray tracing: 76 RT cores (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 64 (RTX A6000) with 304 Tensor cores vs 256.
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile | RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 23,379+2% | 22,815 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 9728+19% | 8192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 41.15 TFLOPS+48% | 27.77 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1575 MHz | 1695 MHz+8% |
| ROPs | 112+17% | 96 |
| TMUs | 304+19% | 256 |
| L1 Cache | 9.5 MB+19% | 8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 64 MB+967% | 6 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 76+19% | 64 |
| Tensor Cores | 304+19% | 256 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is support for DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The RTX A6000 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile supports the newer DLSS 4 Super Resolution, whereas the RTX A6000 is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile | RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 4 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 4) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile has 16 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A6000 carries 48 GB. RTX A6000 gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 576 GB/s (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 768 GB/s (RTX A6000) — a 33.3% advantage for the RTX A6000. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile and 384-bit on the RTX A6000. L2 Cache: 64 MB (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 6 MB (RTX A6000) — the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile | RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB | 48 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 576 GB/s | 768 GB/s+33% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 64 MB+967% | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 12.1 (RTX A6000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile | RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 7th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX A6000). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A6000).
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile | RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | 7th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile draws 115W versus the RTX A6000's 230W — a 66.7% difference. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 175W (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 500W (RTX A6000). Power connectors: Mobile vs 8-pin EPS. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile | RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W-50% | 230W |
| Recommended PSU | 175W-65% | 500W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 8-pin EPS |
| Length | — | 267mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 203.3+105% | 99.2 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile | RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $4649 |
| Codename | AD103 | GA102 |
| Release | March 21 2023 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #49 | #53 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














