RTX 5000 Ada Generation
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs RTX 6000 Ada Generation Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs RTX 6000 Ada Generation FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs RTX 6000 Ada Generation: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,799 less on MSRP ($4,000 MSRP vs $6,799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 80.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.6 vs 4.2 G3D/$ ($4,000 MSRP vs $6,799 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 250W instead of 300W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 6000 Ada Generation across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 32 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (400 vs 568), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
2022Why buy it
- ✅3.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅42% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (568 vs 400).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 32 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ❌RTX 5000 Ada Generation is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌70% HIGHER MSRP$6,799 MSRPvs$4,000 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.2 vs 7.6 G3D/$ ($6,799 MSRP vs $4,000 MSRP).
- ❌20% higher power demand at 300W vs 250W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs RTX 6000 Ada Generation Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1155 MHz to 2550 MHz. It has 12800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 100 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 30,269 points.
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
The RTX 6000 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 3 2022. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 2505 MHz. It has 18176 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 142 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,454 points. Launch price was $6,799.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RTX 5000 Ada Generation scores 30,269 versus the RTX 6000 Ada Generation's 28,454 — the RTX 5000 Ada Generation leads by 6.4%. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX 6000 Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 12,800 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) vs 18,176 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation). Raw compute: 65.28 TFLOPS (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) vs 91.06 TFLOPS (RTX 6000 Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 2550 MHz vs 2505 MHz. Ray tracing: 100 RT cores (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) vs 142 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) with 400 Tensor cores vs 568.
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 30,269+6% | 28,454 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 12800 | 18176+42% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 65.28 TFLOPS | 91.06 TFLOPS+39% |
| Boost Clock | 2550 MHz+2% | 2505 MHz |
| ROPs | 176 | 192+9% |
| TMUs | 400 | 568+42% |
| L1 Cache | 12.5 MB | 17.8 MB+42% |
| L2 Cache | 72 MB | 96 MB+33% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 100 | 142+42% |
| Tensor Cores | 400 | 568+42% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the RTX 5000 Ada Generation is support for DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The RTX 6000 Ada Generation does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The RTX 5000 Ada Generation supports the newer DLSS 4 Super Resolution, whereas the RTX 6000 Ada Generation is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 4 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 4) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation has 32 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 6000 Ada Generation carries 48 GB. RTX 6000 Ada Generation gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 576 GB/s (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) vs 960 GB/s (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) — a 66.7% advantage for the RTX 6000 Ada Generation. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the RTX 5000 Ada Generation and 384-bit on the RTX 6000 Ada Generation. L2 Cache: 72 MB (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) vs 96 MB (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) — the RTX 6000 Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 32 GB | 48 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 ECC | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 576 GB/s | 960 GB/s+67% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 72 MB | 96 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) vs 12.2 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) vs NVENC 8th Gen (RTX 6000 Ada Generation). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) vs AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation).
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (8th Gen) | NVENC 8th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 | AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation draws 250W versus the RTX 6000 Ada Generation's 300W — a 18.2% difference. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) vs 500W (RTX 6000 Ada Generation). Power connectors: 16-pin vs 16-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W-17% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 500W-23% |
| Power Connector | 16-pin | 16-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 121.1+28% | 94.8 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the RTX 5000 Ada Generation came in at $4000, while the RTX 6000 Ada Generation launched at $6799. On MSRP, RTX 5000 Ada Generation was 41.2% cheaper ($2799 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 7.6 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) vs 4.2 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) — the RTX 5000 Ada Generation offers 81% better value. The newer card here is RTX 5000 Ada Generation (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4000-41% | $6799 |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.6+81% | 4.2 |
| Codename | AD102 | AD102 |
| Release | August 9 2023 | December 3 2022 |
| Ranking | #16 | #24 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX 5000 Ada Generation and RTX 6000 Ada Generation
