RTX A2000 12GB vs GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
RTX A2000 12GB
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX A2000 12GB
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX A2000 12GB is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 15.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM.
| Insight | RTX A2000 12GB | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+15.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-15.4%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $150 versus $380 for the RTX A2000 12GB, it costs 61% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 119.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RTX A2000 12GB | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+119.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($380) | ✅More affordable ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX A2000 12GB and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
RTX A2000 12GB
The RTX A2000 12GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 23 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 562 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 3328 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 26 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,721 points. Launch price was $449.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RTX A2000 12GB scores 13,721 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 11,892 — the RTX A2000 12GB leads by 15.4%. The RTX A2000 12GB is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM uses Ampere, both on a 8 nm process. Shader units: 3,328 (RTX A2000 12GB) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Raw compute: 7.987 TFLOPS (RTX A2000 12GB) vs 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Boost clocks: 1200 MHz vs 1755 MHz. Ray tracing: 26 RT cores (RTX A2000 12GB) vs 20 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) with 104 Tensor cores vs 80.
| Feature | RTX A2000 12GB | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,721+15% | 11,892 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 3328+30% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.987 TFLOPS | 8.986 TFLOPS+13% |
| Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | 1755 MHz+46% |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 104+30% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 3.3 MB+32% | 2.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 26+30% | 20 |
| Tensor Cores | 104+30% | 80 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX A2000 12GB | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (RTX A2000 12GB) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the RTX A2000 12GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX A2000 12GB | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX A2000 12GB) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX A2000 12GB | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A2000 12GB) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A2000 12GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM).
| Feature | RTX A2000 12GB | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX A2000 12GB draws 70W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 130W — a 60% difference. The RTX A2000 12GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (RTX A2000 12GB) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 167mm vs 235mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | RTX A2000 12GB | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-46% | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 450W-10% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 167mm | 235mm |
| Height | 68mm | 124mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 196.0+114% | 91.5 |
Value Analysis
The RTX A2000 12GB launched at $449 MSRP and currently averages $380, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 and now averages $150. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 60.5% less ($230 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 36.1 (RTX A2000 12GB) vs 79.3 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 119.7% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2021).
| Feature | RTX A2000 12GB | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $449 | $249-45% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $380 | $150-61% |
| Performance per Dollar | 36.1 | 79.3+120% |
| Codename | GA106 | GA106 |
| Release | November 23 2021 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #177 | #224 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX A2000 12GB and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
