CPU
GPU
RTX A2000
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX A2000
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4060
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 45.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTX A2000.
| Insight | RTX A2000 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-45.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+45.2%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $299 versus $320 for the RTX A2000, it costs 7% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 55.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RTX A2000 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+55.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($320) | ✅More affordable ($299) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Path of Exile 2
League of Legends
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX A2000 and GeForce RTX 4060
RTX A2000
The RTX A2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 10 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 562 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 3328 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 26 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,464 points. Launch price was $449.
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RTX A2000 scores 13,464 versus the GeForce RTX 4060's 19,548 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 45.2%. The RTX A2000 is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 4060 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 3,328 (RTX A2000) vs 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060). Raw compute: 7.987 TFLOPS (RTX A2000) vs 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060). Boost clocks: 1200 MHz vs 2460 MHz. Ray tracing: 26 RT cores (RTX A2000) vs 24 (GeForce RTX 4060) with 104 Tensor cores vs 96.
| Feature | RTX A2000 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,464 | 19,548+45% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 3328+8% | 3072 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.987 TFLOPS | 15.11 TFLOPS+89% |
| Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | 2460 MHz+105% |
| ROPs | 48 | 48 |
| TMUs | 104+8% | 96 |
| L1 Cache | 3.3 MB+10% | 3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 24 MB+700% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 26+8% | 24 |
| Tensor Cores | 104+8% | 96 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX A2000 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | RTX A2000 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (RTX A2000) vs 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX A2000 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 24 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX A2000) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX A2000 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A2000) vs NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A2000) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060).
| Feature | RTX A2000 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | NVENC 8th gen |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX A2000 draws 70W versus the GeForce RTX 4060's 115W — a 48.6% difference. The RTX A2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (RTX A2000) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 167mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 73°C.
| Feature | RTX A2000 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-39% | 115W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-9% | 550W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 167mm | 240mm |
| Height | 68mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 73°C-3% |
| Perf/Watt | 192.3+13% | 170.0 |
Value Analysis
The RTX A2000 launched at $450 MSRP and currently averages $320, while the GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 and now averages $299. The GeForce RTX 4060 costs 6.6% less ($21 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 42.1 (RTX A2000) vs 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 55.3% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | RTX A2000 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $450 | $299-34% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $320 | $299-7% |
| Performance per Dollar | 42.1 | 65.4+55% |
| Codename | GA106 | AD107 |
| Release | August 10 2021 | May 18 2023 |
| Ranking | #186 | #84 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX A2000 and GeForce RTX 4060
