CPU
GPU
RTX A2000
Popular choices:
Radeon PRO W7500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX A2000
Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO W7500
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX A2000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon PRO W7500.
| Insight | RTX A2000 | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 6nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The RTX A2000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $320 versus $401 for the Radeon PRO W7500, it costs 20% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 26.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RTX A2000 | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+26.9%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($320) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($401) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX A2000 and Radeon PRO W7500
RTX A2000
The RTX A2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 10 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 562 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 3328 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 26 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,464 points. Launch price was $449.
Radeon PRO W7500
The Radeon PRO W7500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1700 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,298 points. Launch price was $429.
Graphics Performance
The RTX A2000 scores 13,464 and the Radeon PRO W7500 reaches 13,298 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX A2000 is built on Ampere while the Radeon PRO W7500 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 8 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 3,328 (RTX A2000) vs 1,792 (Radeon PRO W7500). Raw compute: 7.987 TFLOPS (RTX A2000) vs 12.19 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7500). Boost clocks: 1200 MHz vs 1700 MHz. Ray tracing: 26 RT cores (RTX A2000) vs 28 (Radeon PRO W7500) with 104 Tensor cores.
| Feature | RTX A2000 | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,464+1% | 13,298 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 3328+86% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.987 TFLOPS | 12.19 TFLOPS+53% |
| Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | 1700 MHz+42% |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 104 | 112+8% |
| L1 Cache | 3.3 MB+560% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 26 | 28+8% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX A2000 | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (RTX A2000) vs 2 MB (Radeon PRO W7500) — the RTX A2000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX A2000 | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX A2000) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7500). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX A2000 | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A2000) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7500). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A2000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7500).
| Feature | RTX A2000 | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX A2000 draws 70W versus the Radeon PRO W7500's 70W — a 0% difference. The Radeon PRO W7500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (RTX A2000) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W7500). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 167mm vs 216mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | RTX A2000 | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W | 70W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 167mm | 216mm |
| Height | 68mm | 115mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 192.3+1% | 190.0 |
Value Analysis
The RTX A2000 launched at $450 MSRP and currently averages $320, while the Radeon PRO W7500 launched at $429 and now averages $401. The RTX A2000 costs 20.2% less ($81 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 42.1 (RTX A2000) vs 33.2 (Radeon PRO W7500) — the RTX A2000 offers 26.8% better value. The Radeon PRO W7500 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | RTX A2000 | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $450 | $429-5% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $320-20% | $401 |
| Performance per Dollar | 42.1+27% | 33.2 |
| Codename | GA106 | Navi 33 |
| Release | August 10 2021 | August 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #186 | #192 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX A2000 and Radeon PRO W7500
