CPU
GPU
RTX A2000
Popular choices:
Radeon Pro Vega 64X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX A2000
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro Vega 64X
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX A2000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (8 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro Vega 64X.
| Insight | RTX A2000 | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) (14nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | Standard Buffer (0 MB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The RTX A2000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $320 versus $2,200 for the Radeon Pro Vega 64X, it costs 85% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 592.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RTX A2000 | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+592.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($320) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($2,200) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX A2000 and Radeon Pro Vega 64X
RTX A2000
The RTX A2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 10 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 562 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 3328 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 26 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,464 points. Launch price was $449.
Radeon Pro Vega 64X
The Radeon Pro Vega 64X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 19 2019. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1250 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,369 points.
Graphics Performance
The RTX A2000 scores 13,464 and the Radeon Pro Vega 64X reaches 13,369 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX A2000 is built on Ampere while the Radeon Pro Vega 64X uses GCN 5.0, both on 8 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 3,328 (RTX A2000) vs 4,096 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X). Raw compute: 7.987 TFLOPS (RTX A2000) vs 12.03 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 64X). Boost clocks: 1200 MHz vs 1468 MHz.
| Feature | RTX A2000 | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,464 | 13,369 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 3328 | 4096+23% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.987 TFLOPS | 12.03 TFLOPS+51% |
| Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | 1468 MHz+22% |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 104 | 256+146% |
| L1 Cache | 3.3 MB+230% | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX A2000 | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX A2000 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega 64X has 0 MB. The RTX A2000 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (RTX A2000) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) — the Radeon Pro Vega 64X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX A2000 | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX A2000) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX A2000 | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A2000) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A2000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X).
| Feature | RTX A2000 | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX A2000 draws 70W versus the Radeon Pro Vega 64X's 250W — a 112.5% difference. The RTX A2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (RTX A2000) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 64X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Card length: 167mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | RTX A2000 | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-72% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 167mm | 0mm |
| Height | 68mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 192.3+259% | 53.5 |
Value Analysis
The RTX A2000 launched at $450 MSRP and currently averages $320, while the Radeon Pro Vega 64X launched at $2200 and now averages $2200. The RTX A2000 costs 85.5% less ($1880 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 42.1 (RTX A2000) vs 6.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) — the RTX A2000 offers 590.2% better value. The RTX A2000 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2019).
| Feature | RTX A2000 | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $450-80% | $2200 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $320-85% | $2200 |
| Performance per Dollar | 42.1+590% | 6.1 |
| Codename | GA106 | Vega 10 |
| Release | August 10 2021 | March 19 2019 |
| Ranking | #186 | #190 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX A2000 and Radeon Pro Vega 64X
