CPU
GPU
RTX A2000
Popular choices:
Radeon RX 6700M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX A2000
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6700M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 6700M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score and 25% more VRAM (10 GB vs 8 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTX A2000.
| Insight | RTX A2000 | Radeon RX 6700M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) / 7nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (10 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon RX 6700M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX A2000 and Radeon RX 6700M
RTX A2000
The RTX A2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 10 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 562 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 3328 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 26 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,464 points. Launch price was $449.
Radeon RX 6700M
The Radeon RX 6700M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 31 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1489 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 135W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,525 points.
Graphics Performance
The RTX A2000 scores 13,464 and the Radeon RX 6700M reaches 13,525 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX A2000 is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX 6700M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 3,328 (RTX A2000) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 6700M). Raw compute: 7.987 TFLOPS (RTX A2000) vs 11.06 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6700M). Boost clocks: 1200 MHz vs 2400 MHz. Ray tracing: 26 RT cores (RTX A2000) vs 36 (Radeon RX 6700M) with 104 Tensor cores.
| Feature | RTX A2000 | Radeon RX 6700M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,464 | 13,525 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 3328+44% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.987 TFLOPS | 11.06 TFLOPS+38% |
| Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | 2400 MHz+100% |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 104 | 144+38% |
| L1 Cache | 3.3 MB+560% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 3 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 26 | 36+38% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6700M is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX A2000 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | RTX A2000 | Radeon RX 6700M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 3 (Native) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX A2000 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6700M has 10 GB. The Radeon RX 6700M offers 25% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 160-bit.
| Feature | RTX A2000 | Radeon RX 6700M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 10 GB+25% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 160-bit+25% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX A2000) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 6700M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 1.
| Feature | RTX A2000 | Radeon RX 6700M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+500% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A2000) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6700M). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A2000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 6700M).
| Feature | RTX A2000 | Radeon RX 6700M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX A2000 draws 70W versus the Radeon RX 6700M's 135W — a 63.4% difference. The RTX A2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (RTX A2000) vs 500W (Radeon RX 6700M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Card length: 167mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | RTX A2000 | Radeon RX 6700M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-48% | 135W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 167mm | 0mm |
| Height | 68mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 192.3+92% | 100.2 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX A2000 and Radeon RX 6700M
