CPU
GPU
RTX A2000
Popular choices:
RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX A2000
Performance Per Dollar RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the RTX A2000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | RTX A2000 | RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ada Lovelace / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (6 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX A2000 and RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
RTX A2000
The RTX A2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 10 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 562 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 3328 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 26 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,464 points. Launch price was $449.
RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
The RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1155 MHz to 2025 MHz. It has 12800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 100 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,508 points.
Graphics Performance
The RTX A2000 scores 13,464 and the RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU reaches 13,508 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX A2000 is built on Ampere while the RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 3,328 (RTX A2000) vs 12,800 (RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Raw compute: 7.987 TFLOPS (RTX A2000) vs 65.28 TFLOPS (RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Boost clocks: 1200 MHz vs 2025 MHz. Ray tracing: 26 RT cores (RTX A2000) vs 100 (RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) with 104 Tensor cores vs 400.
| Feature | RTX A2000 | RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,464 | 13,508 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 3328 | 12800+285% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.987 TFLOPS | 65.28 TFLOPS+717% |
| Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | 2025 MHz+69% |
| ROPs | 48 | 176+267% |
| TMUs | 104 | 400+285% |
| L1 Cache | 3.3 MB | 12.5 MB+279% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 72 MB+2300% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 26 | 100+285% |
| Tensor Cores | 104 | 400+285% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX A2000 | RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX A2000 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU has 6 GB. The RTX A2000 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (RTX A2000) vs 72 MB (RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) — the RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX A2000 | RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+33% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 72 MB+2300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX A2000) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX A2000 | RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A2000) vs NVENC 8th Gen (RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A2000) vs H.264,H.265 (HEVC),AV1,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 (RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU).
| Feature | RTX A2000 | RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | NVENC 8th Gen |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | H.264,H.265 (HEVC),AV1,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX A2000 draws 70W versus the RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU's 35W — a 66.7% difference. The RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (RTX A2000) vs 500W (RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 167mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85.
| Feature | RTX A2000 | RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W | 35W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 167mm | 0mm |
| Height | 68mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 192.3 | 385.9+101% |
Value Analysis
The RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | RTX A2000 | RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $450 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $320 | — |
| Codename | GA106 | AD102 |
| Release | August 10 2021 | August 9 2023 |
| Ranking | #186 | #16 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX A2000 and RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
