RTX A3000 Mobile vs Arc A750
RTX A3000 Mobile
Popular choices:
Arc A750
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX A3000 Mobile
Performance Per Dollar Arc A750
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX A3000 Mobile is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Arc A750.
| Insight | RTX A3000 Mobile | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) / 6nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (268mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RTX A3000 Mobile remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX A3000 Mobile and Arc A750
RTX A3000 Mobile
The RTX A3000 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 600 MHz to 1230 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,720 points.
Arc A750
The Arc A750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2050 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,600 points. Launch price was $289.
Graphics Performance
The RTX A3000 Mobile scores 12,720 and the Arc A750 reaches 12,600 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX A3000 Mobile is built on Ampere while the Arc A750 uses Generation 12.7, both on 8 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (RTX A3000 Mobile) vs 3,584 (Arc A750). Raw compute: 10.08 TFLOPS (RTX A3000 Mobile) vs 17.2 TFLOPS (Arc A750). Boost clocks: 1230 MHz vs 2400 MHz. Ray tracing: 32 RT cores (RTX A3000 Mobile) vs 28 (Arc A750) with 128 Tensor cores vs 448.
| Feature | RTX A3000 Mobile | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,720 | 12,600 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Generation 12.7 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096+14% | 3584 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.08 TFLOPS | 17.2 TFLOPS+71% |
| Boost Clock | 1230 MHz | 2400 MHz+95% |
| ROPs | 64 | 112+75% |
| TMUs | 128 | 224+75% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 16 MB+300% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 32+14% | 28 |
| Tensor Cores | 128 | 448+250% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX A3000 Mobile | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (RTX A3000 Mobile) vs 16 MB (Arc A750) — the Arc A750 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX A3000 Mobile | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 16 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX A3000 Mobile) vs 12 Ultimate (Arc A750). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX A3000 Mobile | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A3000 Mobile) vs Dual Xe Media Engine (Arc A750). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs Xe Media Engine. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A3000 Mobile) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Arc A750).
| Feature | RTX A3000 Mobile | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | Dual Xe Media Engine |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | Xe Media Engine |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX A3000 Mobile draws 70W versus the Arc A750's 225W — a 105.1% difference. The RTX A3000 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (RTX A3000 Mobile) vs 650W (Arc A750). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin + 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 268mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 78°C.
| Feature | RTX A3000 Mobile | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-69% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-23% | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin + 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 268mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 78°C-3% |
| Perf/Watt | 181.7+224% | 56.0 |
Value Analysis
The Arc A750 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2021).
| Feature | RTX A3000 Mobile | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $289 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $229 |
| Codename | GA104 | DG2-512 |
| Release | April 12 2021 | October 12 2022 |
| Ranking | #205 | #212 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX A3000 Mobile and Arc A750
