CPU
GPU
RTX A400
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The RTX A400 is positioned at rank #26 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Great cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX A400
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 98.8% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTX A400.
| Insight | RTX A400 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-98.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+98.8%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $150 (vs $135), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 78.9% better value per dollar than the RTX A400.
| Insight | RTX A400 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+78.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($135) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX A400 and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
RTX A400
The RTX A400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 16 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 727 MHz to 1762 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,983 points.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RTX A400 scores 5,983 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 11,892 — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM leads by 98.8%. The RTX A400 is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM uses Ampere, both on a 8 nm process. Shader units: 768 (RTX A400) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Raw compute: 2.706 TFLOPS (RTX A400) vs 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Boost clocks: 1762 MHz vs 1755 MHz. Ray tracing: 6 RT cores (RTX A400) vs 20 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) with 24 Tensor cores vs 80.
| Feature | RTX A400 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,983 | 11,892+99% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 2560+233% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.706 TFLOPS | 8.986 TFLOPS+232% |
| Boost Clock | 1762 MHz | 1755 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 80+233% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 6 | 20+233% |
| Tensor Cores | 24 | 80+233% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX A400 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX A400 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | RTX A400 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX A400 draws 50W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 130W — a 88.9% difference. The RTX A400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RTX A400) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin.
| Feature | RTX A400 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-62% | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | — | 235mm |
| Height | — | 124mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 119.7+31% | 91.5 |
Value Analysis
The RTX A400 launched at $135 MSRP and currently averages $135, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 and now averages $150. The RTX A400 costs 10% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 44.3 (RTX A400) vs 79.3 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 79% better value. The RTX A400 is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2022).
| Feature | RTX A400 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $135-46% | $249 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $135-10% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.3 | 79.3+79% |
| Codename | GA107 | GA106 |
| Release | April 16 2024 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #397 | #224 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX A400 and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
