RTX A4000 vs GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
RTX A4000
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX A4000
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RTX A4000 uses modern memory architecture. The RTX A4000 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 1080 Ti lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX A4000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.6% higher G3D Mark score and 45.5% more VRAM (16 GB vs 11 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1080 Ti.
| Insight | RTX A4000 | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.6%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1080 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $145 versus $1,111 for the RTX A4000, it costs 87% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 632.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RTX A4000 | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+632.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,111) | ✅More affordable ($145) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX A4000 and GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
RTX A4000
The RTX A4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,463 points.
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
The GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 10 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1481 MHz to 1582 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 18,606 points. Launch price was $699.
Graphics Performance
The RTX A4000 scores 19,463 and the GeForce GTX 1080 Ti reaches 18,606 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX A4000 is built on Ampere while the GeForce GTX 1080 Ti uses Pascal, both on 8 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 6,144 (RTX A4000) vs 3,584 (GeForce GTX 1080 Ti). Raw compute: 19.17 TFLOPS (RTX A4000) vs 11.34 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1080 Ti). Boost clocks: 1560 MHz vs 1582 MHz.
| Feature | RTX A4000 | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,463+5% | 18,606 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 6144+71% | 3584 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 19.17 TFLOPS+69% | 11.34 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1560 MHz | 1582 MHz+1% |
| ROPs | 96+9% | 88 |
| TMUs | 192 | 224+17% |
| L1 Cache | 6 MB+362% | 1.3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+45% | 2.75 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX A4000 | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX A4000 comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1080 Ti has 11 GB. The RTX A4000 offers 45.5% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (RTX A4000) vs 484 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1080 Ti) — a 8% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1080 Ti. Bus width: 192-bit vs 352-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (RTX A4000) vs 2.75 MB (GeForce GTX 1080 Ti) — the RTX A4000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX A4000 | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+45% | 11 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 484 GB/s+8% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 352-bit+83% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+45% | 2.75 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX A4000) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1080 Ti). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX A4000 | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A4000) vs NVENC 4th gen (GeForce GTX 1080 Ti). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 3rd gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A4000) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 1080 Ti).
| Feature | RTX A4000 | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | NVENC 4th gen |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC 3rd gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX A4000 draws 140W versus the GeForce GTX 1080 Ti's 250W — a 56.4% difference. The RTX A4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (RTX A4000) vs 600W (GeForce GTX 1080 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 241mm vs 267mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | RTX A4000 | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 140W-44% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 600W-8% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 241mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 139.0+87% | 74.4 |
Value Analysis
The RTX A4000 launched at $1111 MSRP and currently averages $1111, while the GeForce GTX 1080 Ti launched at $699 and now averages $145. The GeForce GTX 1080 Ti costs 86.9% less ($966 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 17.5 (RTX A4000) vs 128.3 (GeForce GTX 1080 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 1080 Ti offers 633.1% better value. The RTX A4000 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2017).
| Feature | RTX A4000 | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1111 | $699-37% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1111 | $145-87% |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.5 | 128.3+633% |
| Codename | GA104 | GP102 |
| Release | April 12 2021 | March 10 2017 |
| Ranking | #85 | #95 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX A4000 and GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
