RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 139.1% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (12 GB vs 8 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile.
| Insight | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-139.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+139.1%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 4nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (285mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile
The RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 19 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2235 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 14 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,209 points.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile scores 13,209 versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 31,578 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 139.1%. The RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 5 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile) vs 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Raw compute: 9.032 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile) vs 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Boost clocks: 2520 MHz vs 2610 MHz. Ray tracing: 14 RT cores (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile) vs 60 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) with 56 Tensor cores vs 240.
| Feature | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,209 | 31,578+139% |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 7680+329% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 9.032 TFLOPS | 40.09 TFLOPS+344% |
| Boost Clock | 2520 MHz | 2610 MHz+4% |
| ROPs | 24 | 80+233% |
| TMUs | 56 | 240+329% |
| L1 Cache | 1.8 MB | 7.5 MB+317% |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB | 48 MB+100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 14 | 60+329% |
| Tensor Cores | 56 | 240+329% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile) vs 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 12 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+33% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB | 48 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 4+300% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 9th Gen NVENC (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile) vs NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Decoder: 6th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile) vs AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti).
| Feature | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 9th Gen NVENC | NVENC (8th Gen) |
| Decoder | 6th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC (5th Gen) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile draws 35W versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 285W — a 156.3% difference. The RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile) vs 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 285mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35W-88% | 285W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-29% | 700W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 285mm |
| Height | 0mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 70°C-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 377.4+241% | 110.8 |
Value Analysis
The RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2023).
| Feature | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $799 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $590 |
| Codename | GB207 | AD104 |
| Release | March 19 2025 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #244 | #11 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
