RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile vs RTX A2000
RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile
Popular choices:
RTX A2000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile
Performance Per Dollar RTX A2000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX A2000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile.
| Insight | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.9%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) / 5nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RTX A2000 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile and RTX A2000
RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile
The RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 19 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2235 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 14 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,209 points.
RTX A2000
The RTX A2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 10 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 562 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 3328 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 26 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,464 points. Launch price was $449.
Graphics Performance
The RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile scores 13,209 and the RTX A2000 reaches 13,464 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the RTX A2000 uses Ampere, both on 5 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile) vs 3,328 (RTX A2000). Raw compute: 9.032 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile) vs 7.987 TFLOPS (RTX A2000). Boost clocks: 2520 MHz vs 1200 MHz. Ray tracing: 14 RT cores (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile) vs 26 (RTX A2000) with 56 Tensor cores vs 104.
| Feature | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,209 | 13,464+2% |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 3328+86% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 9.032 TFLOPS+13% | 7.987 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2520 MHz+110% | 1200 MHz |
| ROPs | 24 | 48+100% |
| TMUs | 56 | 104+86% |
| L1 Cache | 1.8 MB | 3.3 MB+83% |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+700% | 3 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 14 | 26+86% |
| Tensor Cores | 56 | 104+86% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile) vs 3 MB (RTX A2000) — the RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+700% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile) vs 12.2 (RTX A2000). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 6.
| Feature | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 6+500% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 9th Gen NVENC (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A2000). Decoder: 6th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A2000).
| Feature | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 9th Gen NVENC | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | 6th Gen NVDEC | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile draws 35W versus the RTX A2000's 70W — a 66.7% difference. The RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile) vs 500W (RTX A2000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 167mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35W-50% | 70W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 167mm |
| Height | 0mm | 68mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 377.4+96% | 192.3 |
Value Analysis
The RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2021).
| Feature | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $450 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $320 |
| Codename | GB207 | GA106 |
| Release | March 19 2025 | August 10 2021 |
| Ranking | #244 | #186 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile and RTX A2000
