RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile vs GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design
RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile.
| Insight | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile | GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.8%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) / 5nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Turing (2018−2022) / 12nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile and GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design
RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile
The RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 19 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2235 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 14 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,209 points.
GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design
The GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 2 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 930 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,444 points.
Graphics Performance
The RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile scores 13,209 and the GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design reaches 13,444 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design uses Turing, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design). Raw compute: 9.032 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile) vs 5.914 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design). Boost clocks: 2520 MHz vs 1155 MHz. Ray tracing: 14 RT cores (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile) vs 40 (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design) with 56 Tensor cores vs 320.
| Feature | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile | GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,209 | 13,444+2% |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 2560+43% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 9.032 TFLOPS+53% | 5.914 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2520 MHz+118% | 1155 MHz |
| ROPs | 24 | 64+167% |
| TMUs | 56 | 160+186% |
| L1 Cache | 1.8 MB | 2.5 MB+39% |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+500% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 14 | 40+186% |
| Tensor Cores | 56 | 320+471% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile | GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design) — the RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile | GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+500% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile | GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 4+300% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 9th Gen NVENC (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile) vs NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design). Decoder: 6th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 4th Gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design).
| Feature | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile | GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 9th Gen NVENC | NVENC 7th Gen |
| Decoder | 6th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC 4th Gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile draws 35W versus the GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design's 80W — a 78.3% difference. The RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75.
| Feature | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile | GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35W-56% | 80W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 377.4+125% | 168.1 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile and GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design
