RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile vs Arc A770
RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile
Popular choices:
Arc A770
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile
Performance Per Dollar Arc A770
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Arc A770 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (16 GB vs 8 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile.
| Insight | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile | Arc A770 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) / 5nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Alchemist / 6nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (280mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Arc A770 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile and Arc A770
RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile
The RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 19 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2235 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 14 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,209 points.
Arc A770
The Arc A770 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2100 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,332 points. Launch price was $329.
Graphics Performance
The RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile scores 13,209 and the Arc A770 reaches 13,332 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the Arc A770 uses Generation 12.7, both on 5 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile) vs 4,096 (Arc A770). Raw compute: 9.032 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile) vs 19.66 TFLOPS (Arc A770). Boost clocks: 2520 MHz vs 2400 MHz. Ray tracing: 14 RT cores (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile) vs 32 (Arc A770) with 56 Tensor cores vs 512.
| Feature | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile | Arc A770 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,209 | 13,332 |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Generation 12.7 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 4096+129% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 9.032 TFLOPS | 19.66 TFLOPS+118% |
| Boost Clock | 2520 MHz+5% | 2400 MHz |
| ROPs | 24 | 128+433% |
| TMUs | 56 | 256+357% |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+50% | 16 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 14 | 32+129% |
| Tensor Cores | 56 | 512+814% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile | Arc A770 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Arc A770 has 16 GB. The Arc A770 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile) vs 16 MB (Arc A770) — the RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile | Arc A770 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+50% | 16 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile) vs 12 Ultimate (Arc A770). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile | Arc A770 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 4+300% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 9th Gen NVENC (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile) vs Dual Xe Media Engine (Arc A770). Decoder: 6th Gen NVDEC vs Xe Media Engine. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Arc A770).
| Feature | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile | Arc A770 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 9th Gen NVENC | Dual Xe Media Engine |
| Decoder | 6th Gen NVDEC | Xe Media Engine |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile draws 35W versus the Arc A770's 225W — a 146.2% difference. The RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile) vs 650W (Arc A770). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin + 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 280mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile | Arc A770 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35W-84% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-23% | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin + 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 280mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 377.4+536% | 59.3 |
Value Analysis
The RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2022).
| Feature | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile | Arc A770 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $349 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $280 |
| Codename | GB207 | DG2-512 |
| Release | March 19 2025 | October 12 2022 |
| Ranking | #244 | #191 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile and Arc A770
