RTXA5000-6Q vs UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)

NVIDIA

RTXA5000-6Q

2021Core: 1170 MHzBoost: 1695 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)

Core: 1250 MHz
Similar parts
·······

RTXA5000-6Q vs UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

RTXA5000-6Q vs UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

RTXA5000-6Q

2021

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
  • UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) is already obsolete for modern gaming, so RTXA5000-6Q is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • 1433.3% higher power demand at 230W vs 15W.

UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)

Why buy it

  • Draws 15W instead of 230W, a 215W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Older hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
RTXA5000-6Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.5% in PassMark G3D (1,522 vs 1,500), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
RTXA5000-6Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs Unknown of VRAM, a 8nm process instead of Unknown node, 64 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2021 generation instead of 0. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
RTXA5000-6Q makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

RTXA5000-6Q vs UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

RTXA5000-6Q

The RTXA5000-6Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1170 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 8192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,522 points.

Intel

UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)

The UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in sem dados. The core clock speed is 1250 MHz. It has 32 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,500 points.

Graphics Performance

The RTXA5000-6Q scores 1,522 and the UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) reaches 1,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 8,192 (RTXA5000-6Q) vs 32 (UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)).

FeatureRTXA5000-6QUHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)
G3D Mark Score
1,522+1%
1,500
Shading Units
8192+25500%
32

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The RTXA5000-6Q gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureRTXA5000-6QUHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The RTXA5000-6Q has 512 MB of VRAM, while the UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) carries 0 MB. RTXA5000-6Q gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the RTXA5000-6Q and System on the UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake).

FeatureRTXA5000-6QUHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Bus Width
64-bit
System
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RTXA5000-6Q draws 230W versus the UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)'s 15W — a 175.5% difference. The UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RTXA5000-6Q) vs 1W (UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.

FeatureRTXA5000-6QUHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)
TDP
230W
15W-93%
Recommended PSU
350W
1W-100%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Integrated
Perf/Watt
6.6
100.0+1415%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the RTXA5000-6Q came in at $2500, while the UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) launched at $0. On MSRP, UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) was 100+% cheaper ($2500 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.6 (RTXA5000-6Q) vs Infinity (UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)) — the UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) offers Infinity% better value.

FeatureRTXA5000-6QUHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)
MSRP
$2500
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
0.6
Infinity
Codename
GA102
Release
April 12 2021
sem dados
Ranking
#53
#776

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.