G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon R9 M370X

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,200 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
✅Delivers 759.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.2 vs 0.6 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Draws 75W instead of 230W, a 155W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

RTXA5000-6Q

2021

Why buy it

✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon R9 M370X: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon R9 M370X is already obsolete for modern gaming.
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌
733.3% HIGHER MSRP
$2,500 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.6 vs 5.2 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
❌206.7% higher power demand at 230W vs 75W.

Radeon R9 M370X

2015

RTXA5000-6Q

2021

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,200 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
✅Delivers 759.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.2 vs 0.6 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Draws 75W instead of 230W, a 155W reduction.

Why buy it

✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon R9 M370X: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon R9 M370X is already obsolete for modern gaming.
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌
733.3% HIGHER MSRP
$2,500 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.6 vs 5.2 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
❌206.7% higher power demand at 230W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon R9 M370X better than RTXA5000-6Q?

Yes. Radeon R9 M370X is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 1,570 vs 1,522 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Radeon R9 M370X is a 2015 card with FSR upscaling, while RTXA5000-6Q is a 2021 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

RTXA5000-6Q is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2021 generation instead of 2015, the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling, and a 8nm process instead of 28nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon R9 M370X can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $300 MSRP. Radeon R9 M370X is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Radeon R9 M370X is about $2,200 cheaper on MSRP at $300 MSRP versus $2,500 MSRP, and you are getting 3.2% higher G3D Mark. RTXA5000-6Q is the newer 2021 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does RTXA5000-6Q make more sense than Radeon R9 M370X?

Yes. RTXA5000-6Q is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, future-proofing, and staying closer to $2,500 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon R9 M370X. The trade-off is that Radeon R9 M370X currently gives you 3.2% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 759.6%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon R9 M370X Benchmark Check

RTXA5000-6Q Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Radeon R9 M370X	RTXA5000-6Q
1080p
low	40 FPS	68 FPS
medium	33 FPS	55 FPS
high	23 FPS	46 FPS
ultra	15 FPS	34 FPS
1440p
low	32 FPS	51 FPS
medium	25 FPS	41 FPS
high	15 FPS	34 FPS
ultra	10 FPS	26 FPS
4K
low	11 FPS	34 FPS
medium	9 FPS	27 FPS
high	6 FPS	23 FPS
ultra	5 FPS	17 FPS

Open Radeon R9 M370X Open RTXA5000-6Q

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Radeon R9 M370X	RTXA5000-6Q
1080p
low	66 FPS	68 FPS
medium	44 FPS	55 FPS
high	32 FPS	46 FPS
ultra	21 FPS	34 FPS
1440p
low	37 FPS	51 FPS
medium	21 FPS	41 FPS
high	15 FPS	34 FPS
ultra	11 FPS	26 FPS
4K
low	13 FPS	34 FPS
medium	8 FPS	27 FPS
high	6 FPS	23 FPS
ultra	5 FPS	17 FPS

Open Radeon R9 M370X Open RTXA5000-6Q

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Radeon R9 M370X	RTXA5000-6Q
1080p
low	71 FPS	68 FPS
medium	57 FPS	55 FPS
high	47 FPS	46 FPS
ultra	35 FPS	34 FPS
1440p
low	53 FPS	51 FPS
medium	42 FPS	41 FPS
high	35 FPS	34 FPS
ultra	26 FPS	26 FPS
4K
low	35 FPS	34 FPS
medium	28 FPS	27 FPS
high	24 FPS	23 FPS
ultra	18 FPS	17 FPS

Open Radeon R9 M370X Open RTXA5000-6Q

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Radeon R9 M370X	RTXA5000-6Q
1080p
low	71 FPS	68 FPS
medium	57 FPS	55 FPS
high	47 FPS	46 FPS
ultra	35 FPS	34 FPS
1440p
low	53 FPS	51 FPS
medium	42 FPS	41 FPS
high	35 FPS	34 FPS
ultra	26 FPS	26 FPS
4K
low	35 FPS	34 FPS
medium	28 FPS	27 FPS
high	24 FPS	23 FPS
ultra	18 FPS	17 FPS

Open Radeon R9 M370X Open RTXA5000-6Q

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 M370X and RTXA5000-6Q

Radeon R9 M370X

The Radeon R9 M370X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 19 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,570 points.

RTXA5000-6Q

The RTXA5000-6Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1170 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 8192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,522 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R9 M370X scores 1,570 and the RTXA5000-6Q reaches 1,522 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 M370X is built on GCN 1.0 while the RTXA5000-6Q uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 640 (Radeon R9 M370X) vs 8,192 (RTXA5000-6Q).

Feature	Radeon R9 M370X	RTXA5000-6Q
G3D Mark Score	1,570+3%	1,522
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Ampere
Process Node	28 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	640	8192+1180%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The RTXA5000-6Q gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 M370X relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	Radeon R9 M370X	RTXA5000-6Q
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R9 M370X comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the RTXA5000-6Q has 512 MB. The Radeon R9 M370X offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.

Feature	Radeon R9 M370X	RTXA5000-6Q
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+700%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R9 M370X draws 75W versus the RTXA5000-6Q's 230W — a 101.6% difference. The Radeon R9 M370X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M370X) vs 350W (RTXA5000-6Q). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Radeon R9 M370X	RTXA5000-6Q
TDP	75W-67%	230W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Mobile	PCIe-powered
Slots	0	—
Perf/Watt	20.9+217%	6.6

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R9 M370X launched at $300 MSRP, while the RTXA5000-6Q launched at $2500. The Radeon R9 M370X costs 88% less ($2200 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.2 (Radeon R9 M370X) vs 0.6 (RTXA5000-6Q) — the Radeon R9 M370X offers 766.7% better value. The RTXA5000-6Q is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2015).