
FirePro M4000
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 M370X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M370X
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro M4000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R9 M370X offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | FirePro M4000 | Radeon R9 M370X |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro M4000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro M4000 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $100), it costs 70% less, resulting in a 238.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro M4000 | Radeon R9 M370X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+238.9%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($30) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro M4000 and Radeon R9 M370X

FirePro M4000
The FirePro M4000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,596 points.

Radeon R9 M370X
The Radeon R9 M370X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 19 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,570 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro M4000 scores 1,596 and the Radeon R9 M370X reaches 1,570 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M4000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R9 M370X uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 512 (FirePro M4000) vs 640 (Radeon R9 M370X).
| Feature | FirePro M4000 | Radeon R9 M370X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,596+2% | 1,570 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 640+25% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro M4000 | Radeon R9 M370X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro M4000 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M370X has 4 GB. The Radeon R9 M370X offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | FirePro M4000 | Radeon R9 M370X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro M4000) vs 12 (FL 11_1) (Radeon R9 M370X). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 3.
| Feature | FirePro M4000 | Radeon R9 M370X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (FL 11_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+100% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro M4000) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R9 M370X). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (FirePro M4000) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon R9 M370X).
| Feature | FirePro M4000 | Radeon R9 M370X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 4.0 | UVD 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro M4000 draws 33W versus the Radeon R9 M370X's 75W — a 77.8% difference. The FirePro M4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M4000) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M370X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.
| Feature | FirePro M4000 | Radeon R9 M370X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-56% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 82mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 48.4+132% | 20.9 |
Value Analysis
The FirePro M4000 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the Radeon R9 M370X launched at $300 and now averages $100. The FirePro M4000 costs 70% less ($70 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 53.2 (FirePro M4000) vs 15.7 (Radeon R9 M370X) — the FirePro M4000 offers 238.9% better value. The Radeon R9 M370X is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2012).
| Feature | FirePro M4000 | Radeon R9 M370X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $300 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30-70% | $100 |
| Performance per Dollar | 53.2+239% | 15.7 |
| Codename | Chelsea | Cape Verde |
| Release | June 27 2012 | May 19 2015 |
| Ranking | #752 | #758 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














