Ryzen 3 1200 vs Xeon W3670

Ryzen 3 1200 vs Xeon W3670 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 3 1200

4 / 4

6,407

0.0%

Athlon II X4 651

Ryzen Embedded R1606G

FX-8320E

Ryzen 3 3300U

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X

Ryzen 9 5900XT

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon W3670

6 / 12

6,424

+0.3%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 3 1200 vs Xeon W3670 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 3 1200 vs Xeon W3670: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 3 1200

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $141 less on MSRP ($109 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
✅Delivers 128.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 58.8 vs 25.7 PassMark/$ ($109 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 130W, a 65W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Stealth), unlike Xeon W3670.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W3670 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (6,407 vs 6,424).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W3670, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads.

Xeon W3670

2010

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +15.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 25.7 vs 58.8 PassMark/$ ($250 MSRP vs $109 MSRP).
❌100% higher power demand at 130W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 3 1200.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W3670 better than Ryzen 3 1200?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon W3670 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 3 1200 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon W3670 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 15.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W3670 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon W3670 is still the better call for a fresh build. Xeon W3670 comes in 129.4% more expensive on MSRP at $250 MSRP versus $109 MSRP, and it still gives you a 15.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 3 1200 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is so cheap, but its absolute performance tier is too low to be the better recommendation now. At roughly 6,407 PassMark with 4 cores and 4 threads, it only really makes sense as a bare-minimum stopgap or a very constrained existing-platform upgrade.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 3 1200 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Ryzen 3 1200 vs Xeon W3670 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 3 1200

The Ryzen 3 1200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Summit Ridge (Zen) (2017) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,407 points. Launch price was $109.

Xeon W3670

The Xeon W3670 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 August 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Gulftown (2010−2011) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.46 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,424 points. Launch price was $295.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 3 1200 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon W3670 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon W3670 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Ryzen 3 1200 versus 3.46 GHz on the Xeon W3670 — a 1.7% clock advantage for the Xeon W3670 (base: 3.1 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen 3 1200 uses the Summit Ridge (Zen) (2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon W3670 uses Gulftown (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 1200 scores 6,407 against the Xeon W3670's 6,424 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon W3670. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 1200 vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon W3670.

Feature	Ryzen 3 1200	Xeon W3670
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	6 / 12+50%
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz	3.46 GHz+2%
Base Clock	3.1 GHz	3.2 GHz+3%
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	12 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Summit Ridge (Zen) (2017)	Gulftown (2010−2011)
PassMark	6,407	6,424
Cinebench R23 Multi	3,013	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,000	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	3,000	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 3 1200 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W3670 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Ryzen 3 1200	Xeon W3670
Socket	AM4	LGA1366
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	24	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 3 1200) / not specified (Xeon W3670). Primary use case: Ryzen 3 1200 targets Budget.

Feature	Ryzen 3 1200	Xeon W3670
Integrated GPU	No	—
Unlocked	Yes	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	AMD-V	—
Target Use	Budget	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Ryzen 3 1200 was priced at $109, while the Xeon W3670 came in at $250. On launch pricing ($109 vs $250), Ryzen 3 1200 was $141 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 3 1200 delivers 58.8 pts/$ vs 25.7 pts/$ for the Xeon W3670 — making the Ryzen 3 1200 the 78.3% better value option.

Feature	Ryzen 3 1200	Xeon W3670
MSRP	$109-56%	$250
Performance per Dollar	58.8+129%	25.7
Release Date	2017	2010

Search Ryzen 3 1200 on Amazon

Search Xeon W3670 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.