
Opteron 6282 SE

Ryzen 3 1200
Opteron 6282 SE vs Ryzen 3 1200 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Opteron 6282 SE vs Ryzen 3 1200 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Opteron 6282 SE vs Ryzen 3 1200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Opteron 6282 SE
2011Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +18.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (6,385 vs 6,407).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.3 vs 58.8 PassMark/$ ($1,019 MSRP vs $109 MSRP).
- ❌115.4% higher power demand at 140W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 3 1200.
Ryzen 3 1200
2017Why buy it
- ✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $910 less on MSRP ($109 MSRP vs $1,019 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 838.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 58.8 vs 6.3 PassMark/$ ($109 MSRP vs $1,019 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 140W, a 75W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Opteron 6282 SE across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Opteron 6282 SE, which brings 16 cores / 16 threads.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 3 1200 better than Opteron 6282 SE?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Opteron 6282 SE vs Ryzen 3 1200 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Opteron 6282 SE
The Opteron 6282 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 November 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Interlagos (2011−2012) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per module). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,385 points. Launch price was $1,090.


Ryzen 3 1200
The Ryzen 3 1200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Summit Ridge (Zen) (2017) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,407 points. Launch price was $109.
Processing Power
The Opteron 6282 SE packs 16 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 3 1200 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Opteron 6282 SE has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Opteron 6282 SE versus 3.4 GHz on the Ryzen 3 1200 — a 3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 1200 (base: 2.6 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Opteron 6282 SE uses the Interlagos (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Ryzen 3 1200 uses Summit Ridge (Zen) (2017) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron 6282 SE scores 6,385 against the Ryzen 3 1200's 6,407 — a 0.3% lead for the Ryzen 3 1200. Both processors carry 8 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Opteron 6282 SE | Ryzen 3 1200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 16+300% | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.3 GHz | 3.4 GHz+3% |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz | 3.1 GHz+19% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per module) | 512K (per core)+25500% |
| Process | 32 nm | 14 nm-56% |
| Architecture | Interlagos (2011−2012) | Summit Ridge (Zen) (2017) |
| PassMark | 6,385 | 6,407 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 3,013 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 3,000 |
Memory & Platform
The Opteron 6282 SE uses the G34 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen 3 1200 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Opteron 6282 SE | Ryzen 3 1200 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | G34 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Opteron 6282 SE) / AMD-V (Ryzen 3 1200). Primary use case: Ryzen 3 1200 targets Budget.
| Feature | Opteron 6282 SE | Ryzen 3 1200 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Budget |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Opteron 6282 SE was priced at $1019, while the Ryzen 3 1200 came in at $109. On launch pricing ($1019 vs $109), Ryzen 3 1200 was $910 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Opteron 6282 SE delivers 6.3 pts/$ vs 58.8 pts/$ for the Ryzen 3 1200 — making the Ryzen 3 1200 the 161.5% better value option.
| Feature | Opteron 6282 SE | Ryzen 3 1200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1019 | $109-89% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.3 | 58.8+833% |
| Release Date | 2011 | 2017 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














