Opteron 6282 SE vs Xeon W3670

Opteron 6282 SE vs Xeon W3670 Performance Spectrum

Opteron 6282 SE

16 / 16

6,385

0.0%

Ryzen Embedded V1202B

Ryzen Embedded R1606G

FX-8320E

Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X

Ryzen 9 5900XT

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon W3670

6 / 12

6,424

+0.6%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Opteron 6282 SE vs Xeon W3670 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Opteron 6282 SE vs Xeon W3670: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Opteron 6282 SE

2011

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (6,385 vs 6,424).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.3 vs 25.7 PassMark/$ ($1,019 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).

Xeon W3670

2010

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Costs $769 less on MSRP ($250 MSRP vs $1,019 MSRP).
✅Delivers 310.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 25.7 vs 6.3 PassMark/$ ($250 MSRP vs $1,019 MSRP).
✅Draws 130W instead of 140W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Opteron 6282 SE across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W3670 better than Opteron 6282 SE?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Opteron 6282 SE is ahead with a 3.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W3670 pulls ahead with 0.6% better PassMark. Xeon W3670 also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W3670 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon W3670 is the better buy right now. Xeon W3670 comes in $769 cheaper on MSRP at $250 MSRP versus $1,019 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.6% better PassMark. The compromise is that Opteron 6282 SE is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 3.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 310.1% better value on MSRP (25.7 vs 6.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Opteron 6282 SE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Opteron 6282 SE vs Xeon W3670 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Opteron 6282 SE

The Opteron 6282 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 November 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Interlagos (2011−2012) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per module). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,385 points. Launch price was $1,090.

Xeon W3670

The Xeon W3670 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 August 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Gulftown (2010−2011) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.46 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,424 points. Launch price was $295.

⚡

Processing Power

The Opteron 6282 SE packs 16 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon W3670 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Opteron 6282 SE has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Opteron 6282 SE versus 3.46 GHz on the Xeon W3670 — a 4.7% clock advantage for the Xeon W3670 (base: 2.6 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Opteron 6282 SE uses the Interlagos (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon W3670 uses Gulftown (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron 6282 SE scores 6,385 against the Xeon W3670's 6,424 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon W3670. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Opteron 6282 SE vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon W3670.

Feature	Opteron 6282 SE	Xeon W3670
Cores / Threads	16 / 16+167%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz	3.46 GHz+5%
Base Clock	2.6 GHz	3.2 GHz+23%
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	12 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per module)+700%	256 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm	32 nm
Architecture	Interlagos (2011−2012)	Gulftown (2010−2011)
PassMark	6,385	6,424

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Opteron 6282 SE uses the G34 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon W3670 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Opteron 6282 SE	Xeon W3670
Socket	G34	LGA1366
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Opteron 6282 SE was priced at $1019, while the Xeon W3670 came in at $250. On launch pricing ($1019 vs $250), Xeon W3670 was $769 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Opteron 6282 SE delivers 6.3 pts/$ vs 25.7 pts/$ for the Xeon W3670 — making the Xeon W3670 the 121.6% better value option.

Feature	Opteron 6282 SE	Xeon W3670
MSRP	$1019	$250-75%
Performance per Dollar	6.3	25.7+308%
Release Date	2011	2010

Search Opteron 6282 SE on Amazon

Search Xeon W3670 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.