Opteron 6282 SE vs Xeon E5-2608L V3

Opteron 6282 SE vs Xeon E5-2608L V3 Performance Spectrum

Opteron 6282 SE

16 / 16

6,385

0.0%

Ryzen Embedded V1202B

Ryzen Embedded R1606G

FX-8320E

Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X

Ryzen 9 5900XT

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon E5-2608L V3

6 / 6

6,415

+0.5%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Opteron 6282 SE vs Xeon E5-2608L V3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Opteron 6282 SE vs Xeon E5-2608L V3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Opteron 6282 SE

2011

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +15.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (6,385 vs 6,415).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 15 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $1,019 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2608L V3 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌169.2% higher power demand at 140W vs 52W.

Xeon E5-2608L V3

2014

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Draws 52W instead of 140W, a 88W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Opteron 6282 SE across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2608L V3 better than Opteron 6282 SE?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Opteron 6282 SE is ahead with a 15.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2608L V3 pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark. Xeon E5-2608L V3 also has the bigger cache pool with 87.5% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2608L V3 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 6 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 87.5% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2608L V3 is still the faster CPU overall, but Opteron 6282 SE is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon E5-2608L V3 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $1,019 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.5% better PassMark. The compromise is that Opteron 6282 SE is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 15.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Opteron 6282 SE is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (6.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E5-2608L V3 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2011), 87.5% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 8 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 6 threads instead of 16/16. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Opteron 6282 SE vs Xeon E5-2608L V3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Opteron 6282 SE

The Opteron 6282 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 November 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Interlagos (2011−2012) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per module). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,385 points. Launch price was $1,090.

Xeon E5-2608L V3

The Xeon E5-2608L V3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 52 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 6,415 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Opteron 6282 SE packs 16 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-2608L V3 offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the Opteron 6282 SE has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Opteron 6282 SE versus 2 GHz on the Xeon E5-2608L V3 — a 49.1% clock advantage for the Opteron 6282 SE. The Opteron 6282 SE uses the Interlagos (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon E5-2608L V3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron 6282 SE scores 6,385 against the Xeon E5-2608L V3's 6,415 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon E5-2608L V3. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Opteron 6282 SE vs 15 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2608L V3.

Feature	Opteron 6282 SE	Xeon E5-2608L V3
Cores / Threads	16 / 16+167%	6 / 6
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz+65%	2 GHz
Base Clock	2.6 GHz	—
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	15 MB (total)+88%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per module)	256K (per core)+12700%
Process	32 nm	22 nm-31%
Architecture	Interlagos (2011−2012)	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark	6,385	6,415

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Opteron 6282 SE uses the G34 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E5-2608L V3 uses LGA2011-3 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.