Opteron 6282 SE vs Xeon X5675

Opteron 6282 SE vs Xeon X5675 Performance Spectrum

Opteron 6282 SE

16 / 16

6,385

0.0%

Ryzen Embedded V1202B

Ryzen Embedded R1606G

FX-8320E

Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X

Ryzen 9 5900XT

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon X5675

6 / 12

6,418

+0.5%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Opteron 6282 SE vs Xeon X5675 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Opteron 6282 SE vs Xeon X5675: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Opteron 6282 SE

2011

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $421 less on MSRP ($1,019 MSRP vs $1,440 MSRP).
✅Delivers 40.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 6.3 vs 4.5 PassMark/$ ($1,019 MSRP vs $1,440 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (6,385 vs 6,418).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
❌47.4% higher power demand at 140W vs 95W.

Xeon X5675

2011

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Draws 95W instead of 140W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Opteron 6282 SE across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 4.5 vs 6.3 PassMark/$ ($1,440 MSRP vs $1,019 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon X5675 better than Opteron 6282 SE?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Opteron 6282 SE is ahead with a 3.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon X5675 pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark. Xeon X5675 also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon X5675 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon X5675 is still the faster CPU overall, but Opteron 6282 SE is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon X5675 comes in 41.3% more expensive on MSRP at $1,440 MSRP versus $1,019 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.5% better PassMark. The compromise is that Opteron 6282 SE is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 3.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Opteron 6282 SE is also 40.6% better value on MSRP (6.3 vs 4.5 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon X5675 is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

Opteron 6282 SE vs Xeon X5675 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Opteron 6282 SE

The Opteron 6282 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 November 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Interlagos (2011−2012) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per module). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,385 points. Launch price was $1,090.

Xeon X5675

The Xeon X5675 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.06 GHz, with boost up to 3.46 GHz. L3 cache: 12288 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,418 points. Launch price was $162.

⚡

Processing Power

The Opteron 6282 SE packs 16 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon X5675 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Opteron 6282 SE has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Opteron 6282 SE versus 3.46 GHz on the Xeon X5675 — a 4.7% clock advantage for the Xeon X5675 (base: 2.6 GHz vs 3.06 GHz). The Opteron 6282 SE uses the Interlagos (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon X5675 uses Westmere-EP (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron 6282 SE scores 6,385 against the Xeon X5675's 6,418 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon X5675. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Opteron 6282 SE vs 12288 kB (total) on the Xeon X5675.

Feature	Opteron 6282 SE	Xeon X5675
Cores / Threads	16 / 16+167%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz	3.46 GHz+5%
Base Clock	2.6 GHz	3.06 GHz+18%
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	12288 kB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per module)+700%	256 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm	32 nm
Architecture	Interlagos (2011−2012)	Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
PassMark	6,385	6,418

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Opteron 6282 SE uses the G34 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon X5675 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Opteron 6282 SE	Xeon X5675
Socket	G34	LGA1366
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR3-1333
RAM Channels	—	3
ECC Support	—	Yes

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Opteron 6282 SE) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon X5675). Primary use case: Xeon X5675 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon X5675 rivals Core i7-980X.

Feature	Opteron 6282 SE	Xeon X5675
Integrated GPU	—	No
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	—	Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Opteron 6282 SE was priced at $1019, while the Xeon X5675 came in at $1440. On launch pricing ($1019 vs $1440), Opteron 6282 SE was $421 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Opteron 6282 SE delivers 6.3 pts/$ vs 4.5 pts/$ for the Xeon X5675 — making the Opteron 6282 SE the 33.7% better value option.

Feature	Opteron 6282 SE	Xeon X5675
MSRP	$1019-29%	$1440
Performance per Dollar	6.3+40%	4.5
Release Date	2011	2011

Search Opteron 6282 SE on Amazon

Search Xeon X5675 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.