
Opteron 6282 SE

Xeon E3-1245 v2
Opteron 6282 SE vs Xeon E3-1245 v2 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Opteron 6282 SE vs Xeon E3-1245 v2 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Opteron 6282 SE vs Xeon E3-1245 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Opteron 6282 SE
2011Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.3 vs 23.3 PassMark/$ ($1,019 MSRP vs $273 MSRP).
- ❌81.8% higher power demand at 140W vs 77W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Xeon E3-1245 v2 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Xeon E3-1245 v2
2012Why buy it
- ✅Costs $746 less on MSRP ($273 MSRP vs $1,019 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 271.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 23.3 vs 6.3 PassMark/$ ($273 MSRP vs $1,019 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 77W instead of 140W, a 63W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics P4000, while Opteron 6282 SE needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Opteron 6282 SE across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (6,357 vs 6,385).
Quick Answers
So, is Opteron 6282 SE better than Xeon E3-1245 v2?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Opteron 6282 SE vs Xeon E3-1245 v2 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Opteron 6282 SE
The Opteron 6282 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 November 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Interlagos (2011−2012) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per module). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,385 points. Launch price was $1,090.

Xeon E3-1245 v2
The Xeon E3-1245 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 May 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 77 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,357 points. Launch price was $462.
Processing Power
The Opteron 6282 SE packs 16 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E3-1245 v2 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Opteron 6282 SE has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Opteron 6282 SE versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon E3-1245 v2 — a 14.1% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1245 v2 (base: 2.6 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Opteron 6282 SE uses the Interlagos (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon E3-1245 v2 uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron 6282 SE scores 6,385 against the Xeon E3-1245 v2's 6,357 — a 0.4% lead for the Opteron 6282 SE. Both processors carry 8 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Opteron 6282 SE | Xeon E3-1245 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 16+300% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.3 GHz | 3.8 GHz+15% |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz | 3.4 GHz+31% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per module)+700% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm | 22 nm-31% |
| Architecture | Interlagos (2011−2012) | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) |
| PassMark | 6,385 | 6,357 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 659 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 2,273 |
Memory & Platform
The Opteron 6282 SE uses the G34 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E3-1245 v2 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Opteron 6282 SE | Xeon E3-1245 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | G34 | LGA1155 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Opteron 6282 SE) / Yes (Xeon E3-1245 v2). The Xeon E3-1245 v2 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics P4000), while the Opteron 6282 SE requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon E3-1245 v2 targets Server.
| Feature | Opteron 6282 SE | Xeon E3-1245 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | HD Graphics P4000 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | Yes |
| Target Use | — | Server |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Opteron 6282 SE was priced at $1019, while the Xeon E3-1245 v2 came in at $273. On launch pricing ($1019 vs $273), Xeon E3-1245 v2 was $746 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Opteron 6282 SE delivers 6.3 pts/$ vs 23.3 pts/$ for the Xeon E3-1245 v2 — making the Xeon E3-1245 v2 the 115.2% better value option.
| Feature | Opteron 6282 SE | Xeon E3-1245 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1019 | $273-73% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.3 | 23.3+270% |
| Release Date | 2011 | 2012 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















